Scores
Dev
← Player leaders
Thomas Castellanos

Thomas Castellanos

Thomas Castellanos is a Dual-Threat QB for Florida State. Thomas's 2025 season ranks in the 0th percentile nationally by opponent-adjusted EPA per play across 410 plays — a developing rate for the QB.

2026 Usage Outlook · projected share of team plays

43%
projected
band 25%'25 50%61%

Regressed toward the QB mean. Model correlation r≈0.46 on a 2019-2025 walk-forward — volume only; efficiency not projected.

2025 Production

Passing
180/309 Comp/Att2760 Pass yards15 Pass TD9 INT58.3% Comp %
Rushing
557 Rush yards9 Rush TD137 Carries4.1 Yards/carry

Performance Analysis · 2025 · vs QB peers

EfficiencyVolumeDual-ThreatConsistencyClutch
Player type
Dual-Threat QB

A genuine rushing threat who stresses defenses horizontally. Extends plays with legs and forces extra gap assignments.

Rushing threatScrambles for valueStresses defensive structure
Peer percentiles
Opponent-adjusted EPA (WEPA/play)0th %ile · below avg
Game-to-game consistency77th %ile · above avg
Key findings
  • Below-average efficiency vs QB peers — value comes through volume, not per-play impact.
  • High-volume role — one of the team's most-used QBs by play share.
  • High game-to-game consistency — reliable floor each week.
  • 5 high-impact games (EPA/play > 0.4) this season — elite ceiling.
  • Particularly dangerous on passing downs — efficiency spikes in obvious pass situations.
  • Production faded as the season progressed — 0.37 EPA/play decline from first to second half.
  • Peak game: 1.19 EPA/play in Wk 2 vs East Texas A&M.

NIL Market Tier· 2025

On3 valuation ↗
Star

Top-10 nationally. Multiple mid-to-large collective deals expected.

Tier is a model estimate based on position, school brand, performance rank, and usage — not a reported deal. NIL deals are private. For a real market valuation, see On3's NIL profile, which factors in social following and actual deal tracking.

Game Log · box score + EPA, week by week

Wk 1 vs Alabama: +0.48 EPA/play1Wk 2 vs East Texas A&M: +1.19 EPA/play2Wk 4 vs Kent State: +0.71 EPA/play4Wk 5 vs Virginia: +0.28 EPA/play5Wk 6 vs Miami: +0.29 EPA/play6Wk 7 vs Pittsburgh: +0.56 EPA/play7Wk 8 vs Stanford: +0.15 EPA/play8Wk 10 vs Wake Forest: +0.42 EPA/play10Wk 11 vs Clemson: +0.04 EPA/play11Wk 12 vs Virginia Tech: +0.25 EPA/play12Wk 13 vs NC State: +0.09 EPA/play13Wk 14 vs Florida: +0.38 EPA/play14
EPA per play, by weekabove 0 = added points · below = lost
WkOpponentResultOpp SP+C/ATTPass YdsPass TDINTQBRRush YdsRush TDEPA/play
1vsAlabamaW31-1714.89/141520083.67810.48
2vsEast Texas A&MW77-38/112373095.4701.19
4vsKent StateW66-10-19.310/132050195.85420.71
5@VirginiaL38-4611.118/322541250.97810.28
6vsMiamiL22-2820.725/452722263.85700.29
7vsPittsburghL31-348.416/232453074.71200.56
8@StanfordL13-20-11.814/282420041.23310.15
10vsWake ForestW42-75.712/162711088.5910.42
11@ClemsonL10-249.523/432501138.03100.04
12vsVirginia TechW34-14-10.112/241891084.04520.25
13@NC StateL11-214.816/322031259.07600.09
14@FloridaL21-403.517/282402166.67710.38

Usage & Situational · Pro

Snap-share proxy
Overall
50.2%
Passing plays
89.1%
Rushing plays
22.8%
Standard downs
41.6%
Passing downs
70.0%
EPA by down type
Standard downs
0.18
Passing downs
0.49
Pass / Rush EPA
0.29 / 0.36

Usage = share of team plays (CFBD has no true snap counts).

Career · rolling EPA, game by game

Per-game EPA5-game avg
2023 · 13 games

Chart shows per-game EPA (bars) and rolling 5-game average (line). Season breaks marked with dashed lines. Line value = est. points over replacement per game.

EPA = expected points added (opponent-adjusted). NIL estimates are model-based ranges, not reported deals. Data: CollegeFootballData. Not betting advice.