Scores
Dev
← Player leaders
Tre Wisner

Tre Wisner

RB·Texas·2025

Tre Wisner is a Featured Back for Texas. Tre's 2025 season ranks in the 0th percentile nationally by opponent-adjusted EPA per play across 138 plays — a developing rate for the RB.

2026 Usage Outlook · projected share of team plays

23%
projected
band 16%'25 28%30%

Regressed toward the RB mean. Model correlation r≈0.52 on a 2019-2025 walk-forward — volume only; efficiency not projected.

2025 Production

Rushing
597 Rush yards3 Rush TD131 Carries4.6 Yards/carry
Receiving
22 Receptions146 Rec yards1 Rec TD6.6 Yards/rec
Returns
1 Kick returns15 KR yards0 KR TD

Performance Analysis · 2025 · vs RB peers

EfficiencyVolumeExplosivenessConsistencyReceiving
Player type
Featured Back

The centerpiece of the run game — high carry volume, used in early downs and goal-line, true workhorse role.

Primary ball carrierHigh volumeGoal-line threat
Peer percentiles
Opponent-adjusted EPA (WEPA/play)0th %ile · below avg
Game-to-game consistency41th %ile · below avg
Key findings
  • Below-average efficiency vs RB peers — value comes through volume, not per-play impact.
  • Particularly dangerous on passing downs — efficiency spikes in obvious pass situations.
  • Peak game: 0.36 EPA/play in Wk 14 vs Texas A&M (SP+ 21).

NIL Market Tier· 2025

On3 valuation ↗
Starter

Meaningful starter. Local collective + position-group deals.

Tier is a model estimate based on position, school brand, performance rank, and usage — not a reported deal. NIL deals are private. For a real market valuation, see On3's NIL profile, which factors in social following and actual deal tracking.

Game Log · box score + EPA, week by week

Wk 1 vs Ohio State: +0.12 EPA/play1Wk 6 vs Florida: +0.06 EPA/play6Wk 7 vs Oklahoma: +0.19 EPA/play7Wk 8 vs Kentucky: +0.04 EPA/play8Wk 10 vs Vanderbilt: -0.04 EPA/play10Wk 12 vs Georgia: -0.05 EPA/play12Wk 13 vs Arkansas: -0.10 EPA/play13Wk 14 vs Texas A&M: +0.36 EPA/play14
EPA per play, by weekabove 0 = added points · below = lost
WkOpponentResultOpp SP+CarRush YdsAvgRush TDRecRec YdsRec TDEPA/play
1@Ohio StateL7-1430.116805.001500.12
6@FloridaL21-293.58111.4121710.06
7vsOklahomaW23-618.322944.3053400.19
8@KentuckyW16-131.812373.1121600.04
9@Mississippi StateW45-384.112413.406170
10vsVanderbiltW34-3120.318754.212280-0.04
12@GeorgiaL10-3524.19374.102100-0.05
13vsArkansasW52-375.115674.50-0.10
14vsTexas A&MW27-1720.7191558.2021900.36

Usage & Situational · Pro

Snap-share proxy
Overall
28.0%
Passing plays
7.9%
Rushing plays
54.2%
Standard downs
34.9%
Passing downs
15.5%
EPA by down type
Standard downs
0.06
Passing downs
0.26
Pass / Rush EPA
0.45 / 0.03

Usage = share of team plays (CFBD has no true snap counts).

EPA = expected points added (opponent-adjusted). NIL estimates are model-based ranges, not reported deals. Data: CollegeFootballData. Not betting advice.