← Player leaders
Trey'Dez Green is a Red Zone Weapon TE for LSU.
2026 Usage Outlook · projected share of team plays
5%
projected
band 3%'25 8%7%
Regressed toward the TE mean. Model correlation r≈0.42 on a 2019-2025 walk-forward — volume only; efficiency not projected.
2025 Production
Receiving
33 Receptions433 Rec yards7 Rec TD13.1 Yards/rec
Performance Analysis · 2025 · vs TE peers
Player type
Red Zone Weapon TE
Goes from good to great inside the 20 — high TD conversion on limited looks makes this receiver a scoring machine.
Red zone targetHigh TD rateSize/catch radius advantage
Peer percentiles
Opponent-adjusted EPA (WEPA/play)100th %ile · elite
Game-to-game consistency77th %ile · above avg
Key findings
- ▸Top-10% efficiency among TEs — elite opponent-adjusted EPA rate.
- ▸Limited usage share suggests a rotational or specialist role.
- ▸High game-to-game consistency — reliable floor each week.
- ▸5 high-impact games (EPA/play > 0.4) this season — elite ceiling.
- ▸Strong second-half surge — EPA/play improved 0.65 from the first to second half of the season.
- ▸Peak game: 2.88 EPA/play in Wk 1 vs Houston (SP+ 7).
NIL Market Tier· 2025
On3 valuation ↗Elite
Top-3 player at position nationally. Collective + national brand deals.
Tier is a model estimate based on position, school brand, performance rank, and usage — not a reported deal. NIL deals are private. For a real market valuation, see On3's NIL profile, which factors in social following and actual deal tracking.
Game Log · box score + EPA, week by week
EPA per play, by weekabove 0 = added points · below = lost
| Wk | Opponent | Result | Opp SP+ | Rec | Rec Yds | Avg | Rec TD | Long | EPA/play |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | @Clemson | W17-10 | 9.5 | 2 | 17 | 8.5 | 1 | 9 | 0.47 |
| 7 | vsSouth Carolina | W20-10 | 5.9 | 8 | 119 | 14.9 | 1 | 24 | 0.98 |
| 8 | @Vanderbilt | L24-31 | 20.3 | 5 | 74 | 14.8 | 1 | 24 | 1.02 |
| 9 | vsTexas A&M | L25-49 | 20.7 | 6 | 54 | 9.0 | 1 | 28 | 1.12 |
| 12 | vsArkansas | W23-22 | 5.1 | 1 | 14 | 14.0 | 0 | 14 | 0.20 |
| 13 | vsWestern Kentucky | W13-10 | 1.6 | 6 | 45 | 7.5 | 1 | 19 | — |
| 14 | @Oklahoma | L13-17 | 18.3 | 1 | 30 | 30.0 | 0 | 30 | — |
| 1 | vsHouston | L35-38 | 7.4 | 4 | 80 | 20.0 | 2 | 42 | 2.88 |
Usage & Situational · Pro
Snap-share proxy
Overall
8.1%
Passing plays
14.0%
Rushing plays
0.0%
Standard downs
9.8%
Passing downs
5.1%
EPA by down type
- Standard downs
- 0.98
- Passing downs
- 0.95
- Pass / Rush EPA
- 0.98 / —
Usage = share of team plays (CFBD has no true snap counts).