Scores
Dev
← Player leaders
Tucker Gleason

#4Tucker Gleason

Tucker Gleason is a Dual-Threat QB for Toledo. Tucker's 2025 season ranks in the 0th percentile nationally by opponent-adjusted EPA per play across 292 plays — a developing rate for the QB.

2026 Usage Outlook · projected share of team plays

39%
projected
band 21%'25 41%57%

Regressed toward the QB mean. Model correlation r≈0.46 on a 2019-2025 walk-forward — volume only; efficiency not projected.

2025 Production

Passing
207/320 Comp/Att2515 Pass yards21 Pass TD9 INT64.7% Comp %
Rushing
144 Rush yards4 Rush TD46 Carries3.1 Yards/carry

Performance Analysis · 2025 · vs QB peers

EfficiencyVolumeDual-ThreatConsistencyClutch
Player type
Dual-Threat QB

A genuine rushing threat who stresses defenses horizontally. Extends plays with legs and forces extra gap assignments.

Rushing threatScrambles for valueStresses defensive structure
Peer percentiles
Opponent-adjusted EPA (WEPA/play)0th %ile · below avg
Game-to-game consistency69th %ile · average
Key findings
  • Below-average efficiency vs QB peers — value comes through volume, not per-play impact.
  • High-volume role — one of the team's most-used QBs by play share.
  • 5 high-impact games (EPA/play > 0.4) this season — elite ceiling.
  • Particularly dangerous on passing downs — efficiency spikes in obvious pass situations.
  • Peak game: 1.02 EPA/play in Wk 5 vs Akron (SP+ -14).

NIL Market Tier· 2025

On3 valuation ↗
Star

Top-10 nationally. Multiple mid-to-large collective deals expected.

Tier is a model estimate based on position, school brand, performance rank, and usage — not a reported deal. NIL deals are private. For a real market valuation, see On3's NIL profile, which factors in social following and actual deal tracking.

Game Log · box score + EPA, week by week

Wk 1 vs Kentucky: +0.22 EPA/play1Wk 2 vs Western Kentucky: +0.85 EPA/play2Wk 3 vs Morgan State: +0.60 EPA/play3Wk 4 vs Western Michigan: -0.35 EPA/play4Wk 5 vs Akron: +1.02 EPA/play5Wk 7 vs Bowling Green: +0.17 EPA/play7Wk 8 vs Kent State: +0.84 EPA/play8Wk 11 vs Northern Illinois: +0.65 EPA/play11Wk 12 vs Miami (OH): -0.00 EPA/play12Wk 13 vs Ball State: +0.05 EPA/play13Wk 14 vs Central Michigan: +0.28 EPA/play14
EPA per play, by weekabove 0 = added points · below = lost
WkOpponentResultOpp SP+C/ATTPass YdsPass TDINTQBRRush YdsRush TDEPA/play
1@KentuckyL16-241.823/402701136.0210.22
2vsWestern KentuckyW45-211.67/121552092.02100.85
3vsMorgan StateW60-013/171741075.30.60
4@Western MichiganL13-14-1.415/30890211.7-40-0.35
5vsAkronW45-3-13.916/192373090.83711.02
7@Bowling GreenL23-28-12.619/302641139.5110.17
8vsKent StateW45-10-19.321/282944079.8100.84
9@Washington StateL7-283.826/412381133.0130
11vsNorthern IllinoisW42-3-16.725/313092092.6910.65
12@Miami (OH)W24-3-3.418/311692260.6230-0.00
13vsBall StateW38-9-23.015/242184246.91000.05
14@Central MichiganW21-3-8.89/17980048.13100.28

Usage & Situational · Pro

Snap-share proxy
Overall
41.3%
Passing plays
82.8%
Rushing plays
7.3%
Standard downs
35.3%
Passing downs
55.2%
EPA by down type
Standard downs
0.21
Passing downs
0.48
Pass / Rush EPA
0.35 / 0.33

Usage = share of team plays (CFBD has no true snap counts).

EPA = expected points added (opponent-adjusted). NIL estimates are model-based ranges, not reported deals. Data: CollegeFootballData. Not betting advice.