Ty Simpson is a Dual-Threat QB for Alabama. Ty's 2025 season ranks in the 0th percentile nationally by opponent-adjusted EPA per play across 548 plays — a developing rate for the QB.
2026 Usage Outlook · projected share of team plays
Regressed toward the QB mean. Model correlation r≈0.46 on a 2019-2025 walk-forward — volume only; efficiency not projected.
2025 Production
Performance Analysis · 2025 · vs QB peers
A genuine rushing threat who stresses defenses horizontally. Extends plays with legs and forces extra gap assignments.
- ▸Below-average efficiency vs QB peers — value comes through volume, not per-play impact.
- ▸High-volume role — one of the team's most-used QBs by play share.
- ▸High game-to-game consistency — reliable floor each week.
- ▸5 high-impact games (EPA/play > 0.4) this season — elite ceiling.
- ▸Particularly dangerous on passing downs — efficiency spikes in obvious pass situations.
- ▸Production faded as the season progressed — 0.48 EPA/play decline from first to second half.
- ▸Peak game: 1.27 EPA/play in Wk 2 vs UL Monroe (SP+ -22).
NIL Market Tier· 2025
On3 valuation ↗Top-10 nationally. Multiple mid-to-large collective deals expected.
Tier is a model estimate based on position, school brand, performance rank, and usage — not a reported deal. NIL deals are private. For a real market valuation, see On3's NIL profile, which factors in social following and actual deal tracking.
Game Log · box score + EPA, week by week
| Wk | Opponent | Result | Opp SP+ | C/ATT | Pass Yds | Pass TD | INT | QBR | Rush Yds | Rush TD | EPA/play |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | @Florida State | L17-31 | 7.2 | 23/43 | 254 | 2 | 0 | 48.6 | 17 | 0 | 0.14 |
| 2 | vsUL Monroe | W73-0 | -21.6 | 17/17 | 226 | 3 | 0 | 99.3 | 3 | 1 | 1.27 |
| 3 | vsWisconsin | W38-14 | -4.4 | 24/29 | 382 | 4 | 0 | 89.7 | 25 | 0 | 0.86 |
| 5 | @Georgia | W24-21 | 24.1 | 24/38 | 276 | 2 | 0 | 90.1 | 12 | 1 | 0.59 |
| 6 | vsVanderbilt | W30-14 | 20.3 | 23/31 | 340 | 2 | 1 | 80.1 | -6 | 0 | 0.46 |
| 7 | @Missouri | W27-24 | 14.4 | 23/31 | 200 | 3 | 0 | 77.6 | 7 | 0 | 0.34 |
| 8 | vsTennessee | W37-20 | 15.0 | 19/29 | 253 | 2 | 0 | 89.0 | 8 | 0 | 0.51 |
| 9 | @South Carolina | W29-22 | 5.9 | 24/43 | 253 | 2 | 0 | 77.9 | 13 | 0 | 0.32 |
| 11 | vsLSU | W20-9 | 10.3 | 21/35 | 277 | 1 | 0 | 79.6 | 8 | 0 | 0.25 |
| 12 | vsOklahoma | L21-23 | 18.3 | 28/42 | 326 | 1 | 1 | 64.4 | -9 | 0 | 0.30 |
| 13 | vsEastern Illinois | W56-0 | — | 11/16 | 147 | 0 | 2 | 47.1 | 17 | 0 | 0.40 |
| 14 | @Auburn | W27-20 | 11.6 | 19/35 | 122 | 3 | 0 | 76.3 | 31 | 0 | 0.00 |
| 15 | vsGeorgia | L7-28 | 24.1 | 19/39 | 212 | 1 | 1 | 19.9 | -28 | 0 | -0.13 |
| 1 | vsIndiana | L3-38 | 32.4 | 12/16 | 67 | 0 | 0 | 60.6 | 17 | 0 | -0.01 |
| 1 | @Oklahoma | W34-24 | 18.3 | 18/29 | 232 | 2 | 0 | 80.8 | -22 | 0 | -0.01 |
Usage & Situational · Pro
- Standard downs
- 0.25
- Passing downs
- 0.45
- Pass / Rush EPA
- 0.34 / 0.33
Usage = share of team plays (CFBD has no true snap counts).