Scores
Dev
← Player leaders
Zevi Eckhaus

#4Zevi Eckhaus

Zevi Eckhaus is a Dual-Threat QB for Washington State. Zevi's 2025 season ranks in the 0th percentile nationally by opponent-adjusted EPA per play across 345 plays — a developing rate for the QB.

2026 Usage Outlook · projected share of team plays

46%
projected
band 28%'25 56%64%

Regressed toward the QB mean. Model correlation r≈0.46 on a 2019-2025 walk-forward — volume only; efficiency not projected.

2025 Production

Passing
192/306 Comp/Att2092 Pass yards15 Pass TD12 INT62.7% Comp %
Rushing
371 Rush yards8 Rush TD114 Carries3.3 Yards/carry
Punting
1 Punts30 Punt yards30.0 Yards/punt30 Long1 Inside 20

Performance Analysis · 2025 · vs QB peers

EfficiencyVolumeDual-ThreatConsistencyClutch
Player type
Dual-Threat QB

A genuine rushing threat who stresses defenses horizontally. Extends plays with legs and forces extra gap assignments.

Rushing threatScrambles for valueStresses defensive structure
Peer percentiles
Opponent-adjusted EPA (WEPA/play)0th %ile · below avg
Game-to-game consistency87th %ile · above avg
Key findings
  • Below-average efficiency vs QB peers — value comes through volume, not per-play impact.
  • High-volume role — one of the team's most-used QBs by play share.
  • High game-to-game consistency — reliable floor each week.
  • Peak game: 0.49 EPA/play in Wk 3 vs North Texas (SP+ 14).

NIL Market Tier· 2025

On3 valuation ↗
Starter

Meaningful starter. Local collective + position-group deals.

Tier is a model estimate based on position, school brand, performance rank, and usage — not a reported deal. NIL deals are private. For a real market valuation, see On3's NIL profile, which factors in social following and actual deal tracking.

Game Log · box score + EPA, week by week

Wk 3 vs North Texas: +0.49 EPA/play3Wk 4 vs Washington: +0.20 EPA/play4Wk 5 vs Colorado State: +0.37 EPA/play5Wk 7 vs Ole Miss: +0.18 EPA/play7Wk 8 vs Virginia: +0.22 EPA/play8Wk 10 vs Oregon State: +0.24 EPA/play10Wk 12 vs Louisiana Tech: +0.29 EPA/play12Wk 13 vs James Madison: +0.07 EPA/play13Wk 14 vs Oregon State: +0.23 EPA/play14Wk 1 vs Utah State: +0.24 EPA/play1
EPA per play, by weekabove 0 = added points · below = lost
WkOpponentResultOpp SP+C/ATTPass YdsPass TDINTQBRRush YdsRush TDEPA/play
3@North TexasL10-5913.87/10720078.8310.49
4vsWashingtonL24-5918.425/362772281.61010.20
5@Colorado StateW20-3-15.616/281892070.63000.37
7@Ole MissL21-2424.024/312182078.61800.18
8@VirginiaL20-2211.118/271831244.63310.22
9vsToledoW28-76.010/221592269.2741
10@Oregon StateL7-10-15.913/241460212.12400.24
12vsLouisiana TechW28-3-1.317/251461082.05620.29
13@James MadisonL20-2412.319/311711161.12610.07
14vsOregon StateW32-8-15.917/281971070.36310.23
1vsUtah StateW34-21-3.126/443343354.33400.24

Usage & Situational · Pro

Snap-share proxy
Overall
56.2%
Passing plays
88.5%
Rushing plays
24.2%
Standard downs
48.1%
Passing downs
72.8%
EPA by down type
Standard downs
0.23
Passing downs
0.23
Pass / Rush EPA
0.19 / 0.40

Usage = share of team plays (CFBD has no true snap counts).

EPA = expected points added (opponent-adjusted). NIL estimates are model-based ranges, not reported deals. Data: CollegeFootballData. Not betting advice.