← Player leaders
#2Aidan Chiles
Aidan Chiles is a Dual-Threat QB for Michigan State. Aidan's 2024 season ranks in the 0th percentile nationally by opponent-adjusted EPA per play across 388 plays — a developing rate for the QB.
2024 Production
Passing
192/324 Comp/Att2415 Pass yards13 Pass TD12 INT59.3% Comp %
Rushing
234 Rush yards3 Rush TD96 Carries2.4 Yards/carry
Performance Analysis · 2024 · vs QB peers
Player type
Dual-Threat QB
A genuine rushing threat who stresses defenses horizontally. Extends plays with legs and forces extra gap assignments.
Rushing threatScrambles for valueStresses defensive structure
Peer percentiles
Opponent-adjusted EPA (WEPA/play)0th %ile · below avg
Game-to-game consistency73th %ile · average
Key findings
- ▸Below-average efficiency vs QB peers — value comes through volume, not per-play impact.
- ▸High-volume role — one of the team's most-used QBs by play share.
- ▸High game-to-game consistency — reliable floor each week.
- ▸4 high-impact games (EPA/play > 0.4) this season — elite ceiling.
- ▸Strong second-half surge — EPA/play improved 0.12 from the first to second half of the season.
- ▸Peak game: 0.72 EPA/play in Wk 3 vs Prairie View A&M.
NIL Market Tier· 2024
On3 valuation ↗Star
Top-10 nationally. Multiple mid-to-large collective deals expected.
Tier is a model estimate based on position, school brand, performance rank, and usage — not a reported deal. NIL deals are private. For a real market valuation, see On3's NIL profile, which factors in social following and actual deal tracking.
Game Log · box score + EPA, week by week
EPA per play, by weekabove 0 = added points · below = lost
| Wk | Opponent | Result | Opp SP+ | C/ATT | Pass Yds | Pass TD | INT | QBR | Rush Yds | Rush TD | EPA/play |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | vsFlorida Atlantic | W16-10 | -12.7 | 10/24 | 114 | 0 | 2 | 30.7 | 28 | 1 | -0.19 |
| 2 | @Maryland | W27-24 | -3.9 | 24/39 | 363 | 3 | 3 | 70.6 | 11 | 0 | 0.46 |
| 3 | vsPrairie View A&M | W40-0 | — | 12/19 | 173 | 1 | 0 | 91.9 | 8 | 1 | 0.72 |
| 4 | @Boston College | L19-23 | 1.2 | 17/35 | 241 | 0 | 3 | 53.0 | 57 | 1 | 0.28 |
| 5 | vsOhio State | L7-38 | 31.2 | 13/19 | 167 | 1 | 1 | 36.1 | -9 | 0 | -0.17 |
| 6 | @Oregon | L10-31 | 26.0 | 10/17 | 154 | 0 | 0 | 48.3 | 29 | 0 | 0.26 |
| 8 | vsIowa | W32-20 | 15.8 | 22/30 | 256 | 1 | 1 | 81.3 | 51 | 0 | 0.42 |
| 9 | @Michigan | L17-24 | 10.6 | 17/23 | 189 | 1 | 0 | 72.4 | 6 | 0 | 0.25 |
| 10 | vsIndiana | L10-47 | 20.1 | 16/24 | 193 | 1 | 2 | 48.0 | -2 | 0 | 0.27 |
| 12 | @Illinois | L16-38 | 9.6 | 23/40 | 256 | 2 | 0 | 72.2 | 40 | 0 | 0.29 |
| 13 | vsPurdue | W24-17 | -16.2 | 15/31 | 159 | 2 | 0 | 44.2 | 26 | 0 | 0.66 |
| 14 | vsRutgers | L14-41 | 6.4 | 13/23 | 150 | 1 | 0 | 28.3 | -11 | 0 | 0.20 |
Usage & Situational · Pro
Snap-share proxy
Overall
54.1%
Passing plays
87.3%
Rushing plays
19.4%
Standard downs
48.1%
Passing downs
66.3%
EPA by down type
- Standard downs
- 0.27
- Passing downs
- 0.32
- Pass / Rush EPA
- 0.29 / 0.32
Usage = share of team plays (CFBD has no true snap counts).