Scores
Dev
← Player leaders
Behren Morton

#2Behren Morton

Behren Morton is a Clutch Passer for Texas Tech. Behren's 2025 season ranks in the 0th percentile nationally by opponent-adjusted EPA per play across 343 plays — a developing rate for the QB.

2026 Usage Outlook · projected share of team plays

38%
projected
band 20%'25 39%56%

Regressed toward the QB mean. Model correlation r≈0.46 on a 2019-2025 walk-forward — volume only; efficiency not projected.

2025 Production

Passing
219/333 Comp/Att2780 Pass yards22 Pass TD6 INT65.8% Comp %
Rushing
-113 Rush yards0 Rush TD43 Carries-2.6 Yards/carry

Performance Analysis · 2025 · vs QB peers

EfficiencyVolumeDual-ThreatConsistencyClutch
Player type
Clutch Passer

Elevates on passing downs — 3rd-and-medium, two-minute drills, and pressure situations are where this QB is best.

3rd-down precisionLate-game valueHigh passing-down EPA
Peer percentiles
Opponent-adjusted EPA (WEPA/play)0th %ile · below avg
Game-to-game consistency66th %ile · average
Key findings
  • Below-average efficiency vs QB peers — value comes through volume, not per-play impact.
  • High-volume role — one of the team's most-used QBs by play share.
  • 4 high-impact games (EPA/play > 0.4) this season — elite ceiling.
  • Particularly dangerous on passing downs — efficiency spikes in obvious pass situations.
  • Production faded as the season progressed — 0.35 EPA/play decline from first to second half.
  • Peak game: 0.98 EPA/play in Wk 1 vs Arkansas-Pine Bluff.

NIL Market Tier· 2025

On3 valuation ↗
Star

Top-10 nationally. Multiple mid-to-large collective deals expected.

Tier is a model estimate based on position, school brand, performance rank, and usage — not a reported deal. NIL deals are private. For a real market valuation, see On3's NIL profile, which factors in social following and actual deal tracking.

Game Log · box score + EPA, week by week

Wk 1 vs Arkansas-Pine Bluff: +0.98 EPA/play1Wk 2 vs Kent State: +0.54 EPA/play2Wk 3 vs Oregon State: +0.93 EPA/play3Wk 4 vs Utah: -0.07 EPA/play4Wk 6 vs Houston: +0.29 EPA/play6Wk 7 vs Kansas: +0.32 EPA/play7Wk 10 vs Kansas State: +0.17 EPA/play10Wk 11 vs BYU: +0.04 EPA/play11Wk 12 vs UCF: +0.40 EPA/play12Wk 14 vs West Virginia: +0.56 EPA/play14Wk 15 vs BYU: -0.18 EPA/play15Wk 1 vs Oregon: -0.11 EPA/play1
EPA per play, by weekabove 0 = added points · below = lost
WkOpponentResultOpp SP+C/ATTPass YdsPass TDINTQBRRush YdsRush TDEPA/play
1vsArkansas-Pine BluffW67-716/202014092.30.98
2vsKent StateW62-14-19.318/262583082.1400.54
3vsOregon StateW45-14-15.923/354644173.5-900.93
4@UtahW34-1022.212/191420229.620-0.07
6@HoustonW35-117.428/403451076.6100.29
7vsKansasW42-174.17/12911074.6000.32
10@Kansas StateW43-207.021/322492168.8-1400.17
11vsBYUW29-715.917/322191057.0-4700.04
12vsUCFW48-9-1.214/201491077.40.40
14@West VirginiaW49-0-6.825/323103089.0-1600.56
15vsBYUW34-715.920/332152073.4-20-0.18
1vsOregonL0-2325.918/321370218.0-320-0.11

Usage & Situational · Pro

Snap-share proxy
Overall
39.4%
Passing plays
78.2%
Rushing plays
4.5%
Standard downs
33.1%
Passing downs
52.2%
EPA by down type
Standard downs
0.10
Passing downs
0.50
Pass / Rush EPA
0.32 / -0.21

Usage = share of team plays (CFBD has no true snap counts).

EPA = expected points added (opponent-adjusted). NIL estimates are model-based ranges, not reported deals. Data: CollegeFootballData. Not betting advice.