Scores
Dev
← Player leaders
Bo Jackson

#25Bo Jackson

Bo Jackson is a Committee Back for Ohio State. Bo's 2025 season ranks in the 0th percentile nationally by opponent-adjusted EPA per play across 173 plays — a developing rate for the RB.

2026 Usage Outlook · projected share of team plays

20%
projected
band 13%'25 23%27%

Regressed toward the RB mean. Model correlation r≈0.52 on a 2019-2025 walk-forward — volume only; efficiency not projected.

2025 Production

Rushing
1090 Rush yards6 Rush TD179 Carries6.1 Yards/carry
Receiving
19 Receptions200 Rec yards1 Rec TD10.5 Yards/rec

Performance Analysis · 2025 · vs RB peers

EfficiencyVolumeExplosivenessConsistencyReceiving
Player type
Committee Back

Part of a rotation — contributes in a complementary role and keeps the featured back fresh.

Rotational roleSituational use
Peer percentiles
Opponent-adjusted EPA (WEPA/play)0th %ile · below avg
Game-to-game consistency67th %ile · average
Key findings
  • Below-average efficiency vs RB peers — value comes through volume, not per-play impact.
  • 3 high-impact games (EPA/play > 0.4) this season — elite ceiling.
  • Particularly dangerous on passing downs — efficiency spikes in obvious pass situations.
  • Production faded as the season progressed — 0.11 EPA/play decline from first to second half.
  • Peak game: 0.98 EPA/play in Wk 2 vs Grambling.

NIL Market Tier· 2025

On3 valuation ↗
Starter

Meaningful starter. Local collective + position-group deals.

Tier is a model estimate based on position, school brand, performance rank, and usage — not a reported deal. NIL deals are private. For a real market valuation, see On3's NIL profile, which factors in social following and actual deal tracking.

Historical Comparables · RB · efficiency + volume + value

Players from 2014–2024 matched on EPA efficiency, play volume, and adjusted value tier — not just one metric.

PlayerTeamYrPlaysWEPA/playLine valTotal EPA
Saquon BarkleyPenn State20162880.3403.997.9
Dalvin CookFlorida State20162920.3404.399.3

Comps are statistical — efficiency, volume, and value tier all factor in. Style and conference context differ.

Game Log · box score + EPA, week by week

Wk 2 vs Grambling: +0.98 EPA/play2Wk 3 vs Ohio: +0.41 EPA/play3Wk 5 vs Washington: -0.07 EPA/play5Wk 6 vs Minnesota: +0.08 EPA/play6Wk 7 vs Illinois: +0.14 EPA/play7Wk 8 vs Wisconsin: +0.22 EPA/play8Wk 10 vs Penn State: +0.19 EPA/play10Wk 11 vs Purdue: +0.25 EPA/play11Wk 12 vs UCLA: +0.47 EPA/play12Wk 13 vs Rutgers: +0.17 EPA/play13Wk 14 vs Michigan: +0.11 EPA/play14Wk 15 vs Indiana: -0.01 EPA/play15Wk 1 vs Miami: +0.13 EPA/play1
EPA per play, by weekabove 0 = added points · below = lost
WkOpponentResultOpp SP+CarRush YdsAvgRush TDRecRec YdsRec TDEPA/play
2vsGramblingW70-0910812.010.98
3vsOhioW37-9-4.0910912.1022100.41
5@WashingtonW24-618.417804.70150-0.07
6vsMinnesotaW42-31.513634.8111100.08
7@IllinoisW34-1612.910474.7022010.14
8@WisconsinW34-0-4.410262.6055700.22
10vsPenn StateW38-1418.1131058.100.19
11@PurdueW34-10-6.114755.4011000.25
12vsUCLAW48-10-8.7151127.510.47
13vsRutgersW42-91.0191105.8211400.17
14@MichiganW27-912.4221175.3044900.11
15vsIndianaL10-1332.417834.902130-0.01
1vsMiamiL14-2420.711555.010.13

Usage & Situational · Pro

Snap-share proxy
Overall
23.2%
Passing plays
5.0%
Rushing plays
41.4%
Standard downs
24.6%
Passing downs
18.3%
EPA by down type
Standard downs
0.08
Passing downs
0.45
Pass / Rush EPA
0.83 / 0.06

Usage = share of team plays (CFBD has no true snap counts).

EPA = expected points added (opponent-adjusted). NIL estimates are model-based ranges, not reported deals. Data: CollegeFootballData. Not betting advice.