#8Brad Jackson

QB·Texas State·2025

Brad Jackson is a Dual-Threat QB for Texas State. Brad's 2025 season ranks in the 0th percentile nationally by opponent-adjusted EPA per play across 489 plays — a developing rate for the QB.

2026 Usage Outlook · projected share of team plays

45%

projected

band 27%'25 54%63%

Regressed toward the QB mean. Model correlation r≈0.46 on a 2019-2025 walk-forward — volume only; efficiency not projected.

2025 Production

Passing

251/352 Comp/Att3223 Pass yards21 Pass TD7 INT71.3% Comp %

Rushing

744 Rush yards17 Rush TD174 Carries4.3 Yards/carry

Performance Analysis · 2025 · vs QB peers

Player type

Dual-Threat QB

A genuine rushing threat who stresses defenses horizontally. Extends plays with legs and forces extra gap assignments.

Rushing threatScrambles for valueStresses defensive structure

Peer percentiles

Opponent-adjusted EPA (WEPA/play)0th %ile · below avg

Game-to-game consistency82th %ile · above avg

Key findings

▸Below-average efficiency vs QB peers — value comes through volume, not per-play impact.
▸High-volume role — one of the team's most-used QBs by play share.
▸High game-to-game consistency — reliable floor each week.
▸6 high-impact games (EPA/play > 0.4) this season — elite ceiling.
▸Particularly dangerous on passing downs — efficiency spikes in obvious pass situations.
▸Production faded as the season progressed — 0.21 EPA/play decline from first to second half.
▸Peak game: 0.67 EPA/play in Wk 7 vs Troy (SP+ -5).

NIL Market Tier· 2025

On3 valuation ↗

Star

Top-10 nationally. Multiple mid-to-large collective deals expected.

Tier is a model estimate based on position, school brand, performance rank, and usage — not a reported deal. NIL deals are private. For a real market valuation, see On3's NIL profile, which factors in social following and actual deal tracking.

Game Log · box score + EPA, week by week

EPA per play, by weekabove 0 = added points · below = lost

Wk	Opponent	Result	Opp SP+	C/ATT	Pass Yds	Pass TD	INT	QBR	Rush Yds	Rush TD	EPA/play
1	vsEastern Michigan	W52-27	-14.7	18/26	214	4	0	66.4	48	0	0.60
2	@UTSA	W43-36	3.7	12/20	286	1	1	87.2	34	2	0.41
3	@Arizona State	L15-34	3.9	25/36	184	1	0	57.0	9	1	0.18
4	vsNicholls	W35-3	—	13/20	180	0	0	86.1	37	2	0.51
6	@Arkansas State	L30-31	-8.8	18/26	230	1	0	66.5	131	1	0.26
7	vsTroy	L41-48	-4.8	19/22	248	0	0	91.4	77	1	0.67
8	@Marshall	L37-40	-4.5	26/38	444	2	1	61.2	48	1	0.42
10	vsJames Madison	L20-52	12.3	18/32	230	1	3	43.5	43	1	0.04
11	@Louisiana	L39-42	-10.1	26/33	360	3	1	60.4	15	0	0.25
12	@Southern Miss	W41-14	-7.1	14/17	192	1	0	91.4	49	2	0.21
13	vsUL Monroe	W31-14	-21.6	25/32	201	2	1	71.4	88	2	0.15
14	vsSouth Alabama	W49-26	-12.7	20/26	280	2	0	95.3	113	3	0.67
1	vsRice	W41-10	-14.8	17/24	174	3	0	40.4	52	1	0.07

Usage & Situational · Pro

Snap-share proxy

Overall

54.4%

Passing plays

95.6%

Rushing plays

26.5%

Standard downs

47.2%

Passing downs

72.0%

EPA by down type

Standard downs: 0.19
Passing downs: 0.58
Pass / Rush EPA: 0.35 / 0.36

Usage = share of team plays (CFBD has no true snap counts).