Scores
Dev
← Player leaders
Brendan Sorsby

#2Brendan Sorsby

Brendan Sorsby is a Dual-Threat QB for Cincinnati. Brendan's 2025 season ranks in the 28th percentile nationally by opponent-adjusted EPA per play across 387 plays — a developing rate for the QB.

2026 Usage Outlook · projected share of team plays

48%
projected
band 30%'25 61%66%

Regressed toward the QB mean. Model correlation r≈0.46 on a 2019-2025 walk-forward — volume only; efficiency not projected.

2025 Production

Passing
206/335 Comp/Att2786 Pass yards26 Pass TD5 INT61.5% Comp %
Rushing
580 Rush yards9 Rush TD100 Carries5.8 Yards/carry

Performance Analysis · 2025 · vs QB peers

EfficiencyVolumeDual-ThreatConsistencyClutch
Player type
Dual-Threat QB

A genuine rushing threat who stresses defenses horizontally. Extends plays with legs and forces extra gap assignments.

Rushing threatScrambles for valueStresses defensive structure
Peer percentiles
Opponent-adjusted EPA (WEPA/play)28th %ile · below avg
Game-to-game consistency75th %ile · above avg
Key findings
  • Below-average efficiency vs QB peers — value comes through volume, not per-play impact.
  • High-volume role — one of the team's most-used QBs by play share.
  • High game-to-game consistency — reliable floor each week.
  • 5 high-impact games (EPA/play > 0.4) this season — elite ceiling.
  • Production faded as the season progressed — 0.39 EPA/play decline from first to second half.
  • Peak game: 1.65 EPA/play in Wk 3 vs Northwestern State.

NIL Market Tier· 2025

On3 valuation ↗
Star

Top-10 nationally. Multiple mid-to-large collective deals expected.

Tier is a model estimate based on position, school brand, performance rank, and usage — not a reported deal. NIL deals are private. For a real market valuation, see On3's NIL profile, which factors in social following and actual deal tracking.

Game Log · box score + EPA, week by week

Wk 1 vs Nebraska: +0.27 EPA/play1Wk 2 vs Bowling Green: +0.86 EPA/play2Wk 3 vs Northwestern State: +1.65 EPA/play3Wk 5 vs Kansas: +0.53 EPA/play5Wk 6 vs Iowa State: +0.41 EPA/play6Wk 7 vs UCF: +0.37 EPA/play7Wk 8 vs Oklahoma State: +0.64 EPA/play8Wk 10 vs Utah: -0.02 EPA/play10Wk 12 vs Arizona: +0.38 EPA/play12Wk 13 vs BYU: +0.25 EPA/play13Wk 14 vs TCU: +0.22 EPA/play14
EPA per play, by weekabove 0 = added points · below = lost
WkOpponentResultOpp SP+C/ATTPass YdsPass TDINTQBRRush YdsRush TDEPA/play
1vsNebraskaL17-206.213/25690160.79620.27
2vsBowling GreenW34-20-12.617/243333094.44010.86
3vsNorthwestern StateW70-015/152535099.83911.65
5@KansasW37-344.129/433882085.65200.53
6vsIowa StateW38-309.913/252142086.06410.41
7vsUCFW20-11-1.212/211912055.73600.37
8@Oklahoma StateW49-17-15.120/292703089.11310.64
9vsBaylorW41-201.413/211112081.8851
10@UtahL14-4522.211/332211123.2281-0.02
12vsArizonaL24-3012.015/281541270.53010.38
13vsBYUL14-2615.925/383002191.93800.25
14@TCUL23-458.323/332823081.65900.22

Usage & Situational · Pro

Snap-share proxy
Overall
60.8%
Passing plays
95.7%
Rushing plays
25.9%
Standard downs
55.1%
Passing downs
74.1%
EPA by down type
Standard downs
0.40
Passing downs
0.51
Pass / Rush EPA
0.40 / 0.61

Usage = share of team plays (CFBD has no true snap counts).

Career · rolling EPA, game by game

Per-game EPA5-game avg
2024 · 12 games

Chart shows per-game EPA (bars) and rolling 5-game average (line). Season breaks marked with dashed lines. Line value = est. points over replacement per game.

EPA = expected points added (opponent-adjusted). NIL estimates are model-based ranges, not reported deals. Data: CollegeFootballData. Not betting advice.