Scores
Dev
← Player leaders
Cameron Dickey

#8Cameron Dickey

Cameron Dickey is a Committee Back for Texas Tech. Cameron's 2025 season ranks in the 0th percentile nationally by opponent-adjusted EPA per play across 195 plays — a developing rate for the RB.

2026 Usage Outlook · projected share of team plays

20%
projected
band 13%'25 23%27%

Regressed toward the RB mean. Model correlation r≈0.52 on a 2019-2025 walk-forward — volume only; efficiency not projected.

2025 Production

Rushing
1138 Rush yards14 Rush TD211 Carries5.4 Yards/carry
Receiving
24 Receptions217 Rec yards2 Rec TD9.0 Yards/rec
Returns
1 Kick returns9 KR yards0 KR TD

Performance Analysis · 2025 · vs RB peers

EfficiencyVolumeExplosivenessConsistencyReceiving
Player type
Committee Back

Part of a rotation — contributes in a complementary role and keeps the featured back fresh.

Rotational roleSituational use
Peer percentiles
Opponent-adjusted EPA (WEPA/play)0th %ile · below avg
Game-to-game consistency45th %ile · average
Key findings
  • Below-average efficiency vs RB peers — value comes through volume, not per-play impact.
  • Production faded as the season progressed — 0.23 EPA/play decline from first to second half.
  • Peak game: 0.68 EPA/play in Wk 7 vs Kansas (SP+ 4).

NIL Market Tier· 2025

On3 valuation ↗
Starter

Meaningful starter. Local collective + position-group deals.

Tier is a model estimate based on position, school brand, performance rank, and usage — not a reported deal. NIL deals are private. For a real market valuation, see On3's NIL profile, which factors in social following and actual deal tracking.

Historical Comparables · RB · efficiency + volume + value

Players from 2014–2024 matched on EPA efficiency, play volume, and adjusted value tier — not just one metric.

PlayerTeamYrPlaysWEPA/playLine valTotal EPA
Saquon BarkleyPenn State20162880.3403.997.9
Dalvin CookFlorida State20162920.3404.399.3
Breece HallIowa State20203010.3404.5102.3

Comps are statistical — efficiency, volume, and value tier all factor in. Style and conference context differ.

Game Log · box score + EPA, week by week

Wk 1 vs Arkansas-Pine Bluff: +0.39 EPA/play1Wk 2 vs Kent State: +0.23 EPA/play2Wk 3 vs Oregon State: +0.29 EPA/play3Wk 4 vs Utah: +0.18 EPA/play4Wk 6 vs Houston: +0.37 EPA/play6Wk 7 vs Kansas: +0.68 EPA/play7Wk 8 vs Arizona State: -0.29 EPA/play8Wk 10 vs Kansas State: -0.39 EPA/play10Wk 11 vs BYU: +0.27 EPA/play11Wk 12 vs UCF: +0.30 EPA/play12Wk 14 vs West Virginia: +0.21 EPA/play14Wk 15 vs BYU: -0.01 EPA/play15Wk 1 vs Oregon: -0.17 EPA/play1
EPA per play, by weekabove 0 = added points · below = lost
WkOpponentResultOpp SP+CarRush YdsAvgRush TDRecRec YdsRec TDEPA/play
1vsArkansas-Pine BluffW67-713906.910.39
2vsKent StateW62-14-19.38101.3221000.23
3vsOregon StateW45-14-15.917774.510.29
4@UtahW34-1022.213675.2232000.18
6@HoustonW35-117.421984.7016910.37
7vsKansasW42-174.12126312.5231600.68
8@Arizona StateL22-263.99404.40240-0.29
9vsOklahoma StateW42-0-15.113473.61170
10@Kansas StateW43-207.021683.21140-0.39
11vsBYUW29-715.9231215.3112400.27
12vsUCFW48-9-1.211777.0221800.30
14@West VirginiaW49-0-6.812796.6031710.21
15vsBYUW34-715.918724.014200-0.01
1vsOregonL0-2325.911292.60180-0.17

Usage & Situational · Pro

Snap-share proxy
Overall
22.8%
Passing plays
7.1%
Rushing plays
38.4%
Standard downs
26.9%
Passing downs
14.6%
EPA by down type
Standard downs
0.16
Passing downs
0.06
Pass / Rush EPA
0.27 / 0.12

Usage = share of team plays (CFBD has no true snap counts).

EPA = expected points added (opponent-adjusted). NIL estimates are model-based ranges, not reported deals. Data: CollegeFootballData. Not betting advice.