Scores
Dev
← Player leaders
Chris Brazzell II

#17Chris Brazzell II

Chris Brazzell II is a Slot Specialist WR for Tennessee. Chris's 2024 season produced 17.0 total EPA across 42 plays.

2024 Production

Receiving
29 Receptions333 Rec yards2 Rec TD11.5 Yards/rec

Performance Analysis · 2024 · vs WR peers

EfficiencyVolumeExplosivenessConsistencyPass-Down
Player type
Slot Specialist WR

The offense's primary passing-down weapon — routes, separation, and reliability on 3rd down define this role.

3rd-down converterRoute technicianHigh passing-down share
Peer percentiles
Opponent-adjusted EPA (WEPA/play)88th %ile · above avg
Game-to-game consistency38th %ile · below avg
Key findings
  • Above-average efficiency for the WR position (88th percentile).
  • Limited usage share suggests a rotational or specialist role.
  • High game-to-game variance — boom-or-bust profile.
  • 5 high-impact games (EPA/play > 0.4) this season — elite ceiling.
  • Particularly dangerous on passing downs — efficiency spikes in obvious pass situations.
  • Production faded as the season progressed — 0.59 EPA/play decline from first to second half.
  • Peak game: 3.53 EPA/play in Wk 3 vs Kent State (SP+ -33).

NIL Market Tier· 2024

On3 valuation ↗
Star

Top-10 nationally. Multiple mid-to-large collective deals expected.

Tier is a model estimate based on position, school brand, performance rank, and usage — not a reported deal. NIL deals are private. For a real market valuation, see On3's NIL profile, which factors in social following and actual deal tracking.

Historical Comparables · WR · efficiency + volume + value

Players from 2014–2024 matched on EPA efficiency, play volume, and adjusted value tier — not just one metric.

PlayerTeamYrPlaysWEPA/playLine valTotal EPA
Dane KinamonAir Force2021390.4100.716.0
Keytaon ThompsonVirginia2021410.3700.615.2
Micah DavisAir Force2021440.3700.616.3
JoJo NatsonUtah State2014510.3901.019.9
Cade HarrisAir Force2024450.3300.514.8

Comps are statistical — efficiency, volume, and value tier all factor in. Style and conference context differ.

Game Log · box score + EPA, week by week

Wk 1 vs Chattanooga: +1.15 EPA/play1Wk 2 vs NC State: +0.21 EPA/play2Wk 3 vs Kent State: +3.53 EPA/play3Wk 4 vs Oklahoma: -0.69 EPA/play4Wk 6 vs Arkansas: -0.13 EPA/play6Wk 7 vs Florida: +0.73 EPA/play7Wk 8 vs Alabama: +0.15 EPA/play8Wk 10 vs Kentucky: +0.04 EPA/play10Wk 11 vs Mississippi State: +0.65 EPA/play11Wk 12 vs Georgia: -0.15 EPA/play12Wk 14 vs Vanderbilt: +0.95 EPA/play14Wk 1 vs Ohio State: -0.35 EPA/play1
EPA per play, by weekabove 0 = added points · below = lost
WkOpponentResultOpp SP+RecRec YdsAvgRec TDLongEPA/play
1vsChattanoogaW69-355911.80231.15
2vsNC StateW51-103.93186.00120.21
3vsKent StateW71-0-33.026331.51533.53
4@OklahomaW25-159.5100.000-0.69
6@ArkansasL14-1911.022110.5015-0.13
7vsFloridaW23-1713.834916.30230.73
8vsAlabamaW24-1725.022713.51160.15
10vsKentuckyW28-185.52115.5070.04
11vsMississippi StateW33-14-4.12178.50110.65
12@GeorgiaL17-3124.3166.006-0.15
14@VanderbiltW36-234.955410.80210.95
1@Ohio StateL17-4231.2188.008-0.35

Usage & Situational · Pro

Snap-share proxy
Overall
5.5%
Passing plays
13.2%
Rushing plays
0.0%
Standard downs
4.4%
Passing downs
8.2%
EPA by down type
Standard downs
-0.01
Passing downs
0.95
Pass / Rush EPA
0.41 / —

Usage = share of team plays (CFBD has no true snap counts).

EPA = expected points added (opponent-adjusted). NIL estimates are model-based ranges, not reported deals. Data: CollegeFootballData. Not betting advice.