← Player leaders
Dierre Hill Jr. is a Explosive Back for Oregon. Dierre's 2025 season produced 19.0 total EPA across 33 plays.
2026 Usage Outlook · projected share of team plays
12%
projected
band 5%'25 9%19%
Regressed toward the RB mean. Model correlation r≈0.52 on a 2019-2025 walk-forward — volume only; efficiency not projected.
2025 Production
Rushing
656 Rush yards5 Rush TD75 Carries8.7 Yards/carry
Receiving
16 Receptions137 Rec yards1 Rec TD8.6 Yards/rec
Returns
2 Kick returns50 KR yards0 KR TD
Performance Analysis · 2025 · vs RB peers
Player type
Explosive Back
Elite per-carry efficiency — breaks big runs and creates chunk plays at a top rate while in a limited role.
Big-play threatHigh EPA per carryCapitalises on opportunities
Peer percentiles
Opponent-adjusted EPA (WEPA/play)100th %ile · elite
Game-to-game consistency45th %ile · average
Key findings
- ▸Top-10% efficiency among RBs — elite opponent-adjusted EPA rate.
- ▸Limited usage share suggests a rotational or specialist role.
- ▸4 high-impact games (EPA/play > 0.4) this season — elite ceiling.
- ▸Production faded as the season progressed — 0.62 EPA/play decline from first to second half.
- ▸Peak game: 2.69 EPA/play in Wk 2 vs Oklahoma State (SP+ -15).
NIL Market Tier· 2025
On3 valuation ↗Elite
Top-3 player at position nationally. Collective + national brand deals.
Tier is a model estimate based on position, school brand, performance rank, and usage — not a reported deal. NIL deals are private. For a real market valuation, see On3's NIL profile, which factors in social following and actual deal tracking.
Game Log · box score + EPA, week by week
EPA per play, by weekabove 0 = added points · below = lost
| Wk | Opponent | Result | Opp SP+ | Car | Rush Yds | Avg | Rush TD | Rec | Rec Yds | Rec TD | EPA/play |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | vsMontana State | W59-13 | — | 5 | 48 | 9.6 | 0 | — | — | — | 0.07 |
| 2 | vsOklahoma State | W69-3 | -15.1 | 1 | 19 | 19.0 | 1 | — | — | — | 2.69 |
| 3 | @Northwestern | W34-14 | 5.8 | 5 | 94 | 18.8 | 1 | — | — | — | 1.42 |
| 4 | vsOregon State | W41-7 | -15.9 | 5 | 27 | 5.4 | 0 | — | — | — | 0.28 |
| 5 | @Penn State | W30-24 | 18.1 | 10 | 82 | 8.2 | 0 | 2 | 12 | 1 | 0.54 |
| 7 | vsIndiana | L20-30 | 32.4 | 3 | -3 | -1.0 | 0 | — | — | — | -0.93 |
| 8 | @Rutgers | W56-10 | 1.0 | 5 | 62 | 12.4 | 1 | 1 | 11 | 0 | 0.78 |
| 9 | vsWisconsin | W21-7 | -4.4 | 2 | 28 | 14.0 | 0 | — | — | — | — |
| 11 | @Iowa | W18-16 | 19.7 | 7 | 45 | 6.4 | 1 | — | — | — | — |
| 12 | vsMinnesota | W42-13 | 1.5 | 6 | 22 | 3.7 | 0 | 3 | 22 | 0 | — |
| 13 | vsUSC | W42-27 | 16.9 | 4 | 28 | 7.0 | 0 | 2 | 9 | 0 | — |
| 14 | @Washington | W26-14 | 18.4 | 6 | 29 | 4.8 | 0 | 2 | 15 | 0 | — |
| 1 | vsIndiana | L22-56 | 32.4 | 5 | 86 | 17.2 | 0 | 2 | 25 | 0 | 0.07 |
| 1 | vsTexas Tech | W23-0 | 27.6 | 5 | 13 | 2.6 | 0 | 3 | 3 | 0 | 0.07 |
| 1 | vsJames Madison | W51-34 | 12.3 | 6 | 76 | 12.7 | 1 | 1 | 40 | 0 | 0.07 |
Usage & Situational · Pro
Snap-share proxy
Overall
9.2%
Passing plays
2.2%
Rushing plays
15.0%
Standard downs
10.2%
Passing downs
6.3%
EPA by down type
- Standard downs
- 0.77
- Passing downs
- -0.03
- Pass / Rush EPA
- 0.79 / 0.56
Usage = share of team plays (CFBD has no true snap counts).