Scores
Dev
← Player leaders
Dylan Wade

#0Dylan Wade

TE·UCF·2025

Dylan Wade is a Versatile TE for UCF. Dylan's 2025 season ranks in the 0th percentile nationally by opponent-adjusted EPA per play across 51 plays — a developing rate for the TE.

2026 Usage Outlook · projected share of team plays

5%
projected
band 3%'25 8%7%

Regressed toward the TE mean. Model correlation r≈0.42 on a 2019-2025 walk-forward — volume only; efficiency not projected.

2025 Production

Receiving
43 Receptions523 Rec yards5 Rec TD12.2 Yards/rec

Performance Analysis · 2025 · vs TE peers

EfficiencyVolumeExplosivenessConsistencyPass-Down
Player type
Versatile TE

Balanced profile without a single dominant trait — contributes across multiple dimensions.

Balanced usageMulti-role
Peer percentiles
Opponent-adjusted EPA (WEPA/play)0th %ile · below avg
Game-to-game consistency44th %ile · below avg
Key findings
  • Below-average efficiency vs TE peers — value comes through volume, not per-play impact.
  • Limited usage share suggests a rotational or specialist role.
  • 5 high-impact games (EPA/play > 0.4) this season — elite ceiling.
  • Strong second-half surge — EPA/play improved 0.29 from the first to second half of the season.
  • Peak game: 1.59 EPA/play in Wk 13 vs Oklahoma State (SP+ -15).

NIL Market Tier· 2025

On3 valuation ↗
Star

Top-10 nationally. Multiple mid-to-large collective deals expected.

Tier is a model estimate based on position, school brand, performance rank, and usage — not a reported deal. NIL deals are private. For a real market valuation, see On3's NIL profile, which factors in social following and actual deal tracking.

Historical Comparables · TE · efficiency + volume + value

Players from 2014–2024 matched on EPA efficiency, play volume, and adjusted value tier — not just one metric.

PlayerTeamYrPlaysWEPA/playLine valTotal EPA
Johnny LanganRutgers2020590.3000.017.7
Jordan MyersRice2021590.2700.215.9
Evan SvobodaWyoming2024750.2900.021.8
Johnny LanganRutgers2021370.2400.08.9
D'Vaughn PennamonOle Miss2017550.2000.011.0

Comps are statistical — efficiency, volume, and value tier all factor in. Style and conference context differ.

Game Log · box score + EPA, week by week

Wk 1 vs Jacksonville State: +0.27 EPA/play1Wk 4 vs North Carolina: +0.07 EPA/play4Wk 6 vs Kansas: -0.82 EPA/play6Wk 7 vs Cincinnati: +0.47 EPA/play7Wk 8 vs West Virginia: +0.93 EPA/play8Wk 10 vs Baylor: +0.16 EPA/play10Wk 11 vs Houston: +0.42 EPA/play11Wk 12 vs Texas Tech: +0.47 EPA/play12Wk 13 vs Oklahoma State: +1.59 EPA/play13Wk 14 vs BYU: -0.28 EPA/play14
EPA per play, by weekabove 0 = added points · below = lost
WkOpponentResultOpp SP+RecRec YdsAvgRec TDLongEPA/play
1vsJacksonville StateW17-10-6.745413.51390.27
4vsNorth CarolinaW34-9-6.65479.40180.07
6vsKansasL20-274.11-1-1.000-0.82
7@CincinnatiL11-204.555511.00300.47
8vsWest VirginiaW45-13-6.833311.00140.93
10@BaylorL3-301.45346.80120.16
11vsHoustonL27-307.468013.30240.42
12@Texas TechL9-4827.66457.51120.47
13vsOklahoma StateW17-14-15.1414536.32831.59
14@BYUL21-4115.94317.8117-0.28

Usage & Situational · Pro

Snap-share proxy
Overall
8.1%
Passing plays
15.4%
Rushing plays
0.0%
Standard downs
8.2%
Passing downs
7.9%
EPA by down type
Standard downs
0.38
Passing downs
0.11
Pass / Rush EPA
0.28 / —

Usage = share of team plays (CFBD has no true snap counts).

EPA = expected points added (opponent-adjusted). NIL estimates are model-based ranges, not reported deals. Data: CollegeFootballData. Not betting advice.