Scores
Dev
← Player leaders
Eni Falayi

Eni Falayi

Eni Falayi is a Versatile TE for Wake Forest.

2026 Usage Outlook · projected share of team plays

4%
projected
band 2%'25 5%6%

Regressed toward the TE mean. Model correlation r≈0.42 on a 2019-2025 walk-forward — volume only; efficiency not projected.

2025 Production

Receiving
21 Receptions228 Rec yards2 Rec TD10.9 Yards/rec

Performance Analysis · 2025 · vs TE peers

EfficiencyVolumeExplosivenessConsistencyPass-Down
Player type
Versatile TE

Balanced profile without a single dominant trait — contributes across multiple dimensions.

Balanced usageMulti-role
Peer percentiles
Opponent-adjusted EPA (WEPA/play)100th %ile · elite
Game-to-game consistency73th %ile · average
Key findings
  • Top-10% efficiency among TEs — elite opponent-adjusted EPA rate.
  • Limited usage share suggests a rotational or specialist role.
  • High game-to-game consistency — reliable floor each week.
  • 5 high-impact games (EPA/play > 0.4) this season — elite ceiling.
  • Particularly dangerous on passing downs — efficiency spikes in obvious pass situations.
  • Production faded as the season progressed — 0.67 EPA/play decline from first to second half.
  • Peak game: 2.42 EPA/play in Wk 3 vs NC State (SP+ 5).

NIL Market Tier· 2025

On3 valuation ↗
Elite

Top-3 player at position nationally. Collective + national brand deals.

Tier is a model estimate based on position, school brand, performance rank, and usage — not a reported deal. NIL deals are private. For a real market valuation, see On3's NIL profile, which factors in social following and actual deal tracking.

Historical Comparables · TE · efficiency + volume + value

Players from 2014–2024 matched on EPA efficiency, play volume, and adjusted value tier — not just one metric.

PlayerTeamYrPlaysWEPA/playLine valTotal EPA
Ty ThompsonTulane2024480.4200.420.2
Seth GreenMinnesota2018830.3900.032.4
Johnny LanganRutgers2020590.3000.017.7
Evan SvobodaWyoming2024750.2900.021.8
Jordan MyersRice2021590.2700.215.9

Comps are statistical — efficiency, volume, and value tier all factor in. Style and conference context differ.

Game Log · box score + EPA, week by week

Wk 1 vs Kennesaw State: +1.04 EPA/play1Wk 3 vs NC State: +2.42 EPA/play3Wk 5 vs Georgia Tech: +1.11 EPA/play5Wk 6 vs Virginia Tech: +0.67 EPA/play6Wk 11 vs Virginia: +2.12 EPA/play11Wk 14 vs Duke: -0.12 EPA/play14Wk 1 vs Mississippi State: -0.07 EPA/play1
EPA per play, by weekabove 0 = added points · below = lost
WkOpponentResultOpp SP+RecRec YdsAvgRec TDLongEPA/play
1vsKennesaw StateW10-9-5.445213.00181.04
3vsNC StateL24-344.814242.00422.42
5vsGeorgia TechL29-309.333913.00141.11
6@Virginia TechW30-23-10.145012.51260.67
9vsSMUW13-1213.43258.3114
11@VirginiaW16-911.1166.0062.12
14@DukeL32-496.6341.305-0.12
1vsMississippi StateW43-294.12105.0010-0.07

Usage & Situational · Pro

Snap-share proxy
Overall
4.6%
Passing plays
9.4%
Rushing plays
0.0%
Standard downs
5.0%
Passing downs
3.9%
EPA by down type
Standard downs
0.56
Passing downs
1.06
Pass / Rush EPA
0.69 / —

Usage = share of team plays (CFBD has no true snap counts).

EPA = expected points added (opponent-adjusted). NIL estimates are model-based ranges, not reported deals. Data: CollegeFootballData. Not betting advice.