Scores
Dev
← Player leaders
Gabe Burkle

#84Gabe Burkle

Gabe Burkle is a Slot Specialist TE for Iowa State. Gabe's 2025 season produced 18.2 total EPA across 33 plays.

2026 Usage Outlook · projected share of team plays

4%
projected
band 2%'25 6%7%

Regressed toward the TE mean. Model correlation r≈0.42 on a 2019-2025 walk-forward — volume only; efficiency not projected.

2025 Production

Receiving
26 Receptions302 Rec yards1 Rec TD11.6 Yards/rec

Performance Analysis · 2025 · vs TE peers

EfficiencyVolumeExplosivenessConsistencyPass-Down
Player type
Slot Specialist TE

The offense's primary passing-down weapon — routes, separation, and reliability on 3rd down define this role.

3rd-down converterRoute technicianHigh passing-down share
Peer percentiles
Opponent-adjusted EPA (WEPA/play)100th %ile · elite
Game-to-game consistency70th %ile · average
Key findings
  • Top-10% efficiency among TEs — elite opponent-adjusted EPA rate.
  • Limited usage share suggests a rotational or specialist role.
  • High game-to-game consistency — reliable floor each week.
  • 5 high-impact games (EPA/play > 0.4) this season — elite ceiling.
  • Production faded as the season progressed — 1.60 EPA/play decline from first to second half.
  • Peak game: 2.21 EPA/play in Wk 1 vs South Dakota.

NIL Market Tier· 2025

On3 valuation ↗
Elite

Top-3 player at position nationally. Collective + national brand deals.

Tier is a model estimate based on position, school brand, performance rank, and usage — not a reported deal. NIL deals are private. For a real market valuation, see On3's NIL profile, which factors in social following and actual deal tracking.

Historical Comparables · TE · efficiency + volume + value

Players from 2014–2024 matched on EPA efficiency, play volume, and adjusted value tier — not just one metric.

PlayerTeamYrPlaysWEPA/playLine valTotal EPA
Ty ThompsonTulane2024480.4200.420.2
Seth GreenMinnesota2018830.3900.032.4
Johnny LanganRutgers2020590.3000.017.7
Evan SvobodaWyoming2024750.2900.021.8
Jordan MyersRice2021590.2700.215.9

Comps are statistical — efficiency, volume, and value tier all factor in. Style and conference context differ.

Game Log · box score + EPA, week by week

Wk 1 vs South Dakota: +2.21 EPA/play1Wk 1 vs Kansas State: +2.21 EPA/play1Wk 2 vs Iowa: +1.45 EPA/play2Wk 5 vs Arizona: +1.24 EPA/play5Wk 6 vs Cincinnati: -0.15 EPA/play6Wk 7 vs Colorado: +0.23 EPA/play7Wk 10 vs Arizona State: -0.42 EPA/play10Wk 11 vs TCU: +0.73 EPA/play11
EPA per play, by weekabove 0 = added points · below = lost
WkOpponentResultOpp SP+RecRec YdsAvgRec TDLongEPA/play
1vsSouth DakotaW55-748521.31442.21
1vsKansas StateW24-217.033110.30172.21
2vsIowaW16-1319.733311.00171.45
5vsArizonaW39-1412.02199.50111.24
6@CincinnatiL30-384.52126.008-0.15
7@ColoradoL17-24-8.334214.00150.23
9vsBYUL27-4115.95448.8015
10vsArizona StateL19-243.92147.0010-0.42
11@TCUW20-178.322211.00140.73

Usage & Situational · Pro

Snap-share proxy
Overall
5.9%
Passing plays
12.6%
Rushing plays
0.3%
Standard downs
4.6%
Passing downs
9.1%
EPA by down type
Standard downs
0.76
Passing downs
0.30
Pass / Rush EPA
0.58 / -0.27

Usage = share of team plays (CFBD has no true snap counts).

EPA = expected points added (opponent-adjusted). NIL estimates are model-based ranges, not reported deals. Data: CollegeFootballData. Not betting advice.