← Player leaders
Jamari Johnson is a Slot Specialist TE for Oregon. Jamari's 2025 season produced 36.5 total EPA across 33 plays.
2026 Usage Outlook · projected share of team plays
4%
projected
band 2%'25 4%6%
Regressed toward the TE mean. Model correlation r≈0.42 on a 2019-2025 walk-forward — volume only; efficiency not projected.
2025 Production
Receiving
32 Receptions510 Rec yards3 Rec TD15.9 Yards/rec
Performance Analysis · 2025 · vs TE peers
Player type
Slot Specialist TE
The offense's primary passing-down weapon — routes, separation, and reliability on 3rd down define this role.
3rd-down converterRoute technicianHigh passing-down share
Peer percentiles
Opponent-adjusted EPA (WEPA/play)100th %ile · elite
Game-to-game consistency77th %ile · above avg
Key findings
- ▸Top-10% efficiency among TEs — elite opponent-adjusted EPA rate.
- ▸Limited usage share suggests a rotational or specialist role.
- ▸High game-to-game consistency — reliable floor each week.
- ▸10 high-impact games (EPA/play > 0.4) this season — elite ceiling.
- ▸Particularly dangerous on passing downs — efficiency spikes in obvious pass situations.
- ▸Strong second-half surge — EPA/play improved 0.50 from the first to second half of the season.
- ▸Peak game: 2.64 EPA/play in Wk 14 vs Washington (SP+ 18).
NIL Market Tier· 2025
On3 valuation ↗Elite
Top-3 player at position nationally. Collective + national brand deals.
Tier is a model estimate based on position, school brand, performance rank, and usage — not a reported deal. NIL deals are private. For a real market valuation, see On3's NIL profile, which factors in social following and actual deal tracking.
Game Log · box score + EPA, week by week
EPA per play, by weekabove 0 = added points · below = lost
| Wk | Opponent | Result | Opp SP+ | Rec | Rec Yds | Avg | Rec TD | Long | EPA/play |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2 | vsOklahoma State | W69-3 | -15.1 | 1 | 6 | 6.0 | 0 | 6 | 0.40 |
| 3 | @Northwestern | W34-14 | 5.8 | 2 | 22 | 11.0 | 0 | 17 | -0.13 |
| 4 | vsOregon State | W41-7 | -15.9 | 2 | 21 | 10.5 | 0 | 13 | 1.80 |
| 5 | @Penn State | W30-24 | 18.1 | 1 | 2 | 2.0 | 1 | 2 | 1.21 |
| 7 | vsIndiana | L20-30 | 32.4 | 1 | 3 | 3.0 | 0 | 3 | -0.44 |
| 8 | @Rutgers | W56-10 | 1.0 | 1 | 56 | 56.0 | 0 | 56 | 2.06 |
| 9 | vsWisconsin | W21-7 | -4.4 | 1 | 23 | 23.0 | 0 | 23 | — |
| 11 | @Iowa | W18-16 | 19.7 | 4 | 36 | 9.0 | 0 | 21 | 0.51 |
| 12 | vsMinnesota | W42-13 | 1.5 | 4 | 57 | 14.3 | 0 | 24 | 0.79 |
| 13 | vsUSC | W42-27 | 16.9 | 3 | 34 | 11.3 | 0 | 15 | 1.28 |
| 14 | @Washington | W26-14 | 18.4 | 3 | 60 | 20.0 | 0 | 31 | 2.64 |
| 1 | vsIndiana | L22-56 | 32.4 | 4 | 83 | 20.8 | 1 | 39 | 1.32 |
| 1 | vsTexas Tech | W23-0 | 27.6 | 4 | 66 | 16.5 | 0 | 26 | 1.32 |
| 1 | vsJames Madison | W51-34 | 12.3 | 1 | 41 | 41.0 | 1 | 41 | 1.32 |
Usage & Situational · Pro
Snap-share proxy
Overall
4.4%
Passing plays
9.6%
Rushing plays
0.0%
Standard downs
3.0%
Passing downs
8.3%
EPA by down type
- Standard downs
- 0.54
- Passing downs
- 1.79
- Pass / Rush EPA
- 1.11 / —
Usage = share of team plays (CFBD has no true snap counts).