Scores
Dev
← Player leaders
Jekail Middlebrook

#9Jekail Middlebrook

Jekail Middlebrook is a Pass-Catching Back for Middle Tennessee. Jekail's 2025 season ranks in the 0th percentile nationally by opponent-adjusted EPA per play across 180 plays — a developing rate for the RB.

2026 Usage Outlook · projected share of team plays

22%
projected
band 15%'25 26%29%

Regressed toward the RB mean. Model correlation r≈0.52 on a 2019-2025 walk-forward — volume only; efficiency not projected.

2025 Production

Rushing
752 Rush yards4 Rush TD140 Carries5.4 Yards/carry
Receiving
40 Receptions412 Rec yards3 Rec TD10.3 Yards/rec
Returns
8 Punt returns64 PR yards0 PR TD

Performance Analysis · 2025 · vs RB peers

EfficiencyVolumeExplosivenessConsistencyReceiving
Player type
Pass-Catching Back

Third-down weapon out of the backfield. Routes, hands, and separation in coverage define this role as much as rushing.

3rd-down backReceiving threatPass protection
Peer percentiles
Opponent-adjusted EPA (WEPA/play)0th %ile · below avg
Game-to-game consistency47th %ile · average
Key findings
  • Below-average efficiency vs RB peers — value comes through volume, not per-play impact.
  • Peak game: 0.50 EPA/play in Wk 4 vs Marshall (SP+ -5).

NIL Market Tier· 2025

On3 valuation ↗
Starter

Meaningful starter. Local collective + position-group deals.

Tier is a model estimate based on position, school brand, performance rank, and usage — not a reported deal. NIL deals are private. For a real market valuation, see On3's NIL profile, which factors in social following and actual deal tracking.

Historical Comparables · RB · efficiency + volume + value

Players from 2014–2024 matched on EPA efficiency, play volume, and adjusted value tier — not just one metric.

PlayerTeamYrPlaysWEPA/playLine valTotal EPA
Saquon BarkleyPenn State20162880.3403.997.9

Comps are statistical — efficiency, volume, and value tier all factor in. Style and conference context differ.

Game Log · box score + EPA, week by week

Wk 1 vs Austin Peay: -0.03 EPA/play1Wk 2 vs Wisconsin: -0.03 EPA/play2Wk 3 vs Nevada: +0.01 EPA/play3Wk 4 vs Marshall: +0.50 EPA/play4Wk 5 vs Kennesaw State: +0.22 EPA/play5Wk 7 vs Missouri State: -0.01 EPA/play7Wk 10 vs Jacksonville State: -0.02 EPA/play10Wk 11 vs Florida International: +0.14 EPA/play11Wk 13 vs Sam Houston: +0.13 EPA/play13Wk 14 vs New Mexico State: -0.01 EPA/play14
EPA per play, by weekabove 0 = added points · below = lost
WkOpponentResultOpp SP+CarRush YdsAvgRush TDRecRec YdsRec TDEPA/play
1vsAustin PeayL14-3411484.402210-0.03
2@WisconsinL10-42-4.412272.305360-0.03
3@NevadaW14-13-13.410676.7043000.01
4vsMarshallL28-42-4.568914.8044700.50
5@Kennesaw StateL16-24-5.4201095.5231200.22
7vsMissouri StateL20-22-10.717935.503190-0.01
9@DelawareL28-31-10.911686.215530
10vsJacksonville StateL21-24-6.710202.016871-0.02
11vsFlorida InternationalL30-56-10.58303.8056410.14
13vsSam HoustonW31-17-27.8151067.1023110.13
14@New Mexico StateW31-24-15.520954.801120-0.01

Usage & Situational · Pro

Snap-share proxy
Overall
26.3%
Passing plays
11.4%
Rushing plays
51.8%
Standard downs
27.8%
Passing downs
23.2%
EPA by down type
Standard downs
0.05
Passing downs
0.14
Pass / Rush EPA
0.13 / 0.06

Usage = share of team plays (CFBD has no true snap counts).

EPA = expected points added (opponent-adjusted). NIL estimates are model-based ranges, not reported deals. Data: CollegeFootballData. Not betting advice.