Scores
Dev
← Player leaders
Jeremiah Hasley

#85Jeremiah Hasley

TE·Duke·2025

Jeremiah Hasley is a Versatile TE for Duke. Jeremiah's 2025 season produced 27.2 total EPA across 45 plays.

2026 Usage Outlook · projected share of team plays

4%
projected
band 2%'25 5%6%

Regressed toward the TE mean. Model correlation r≈0.42 on a 2019-2025 walk-forward — volume only; efficiency not projected.

2025 Production

Receiving
40 Receptions454 Rec yards6 Rec TD11.3 Yards/rec

Performance Analysis · 2025 · vs TE peers

EfficiencyVolumeExplosivenessConsistencyPass-Down
Player type
Versatile TE

Balanced profile without a single dominant trait — contributes across multiple dimensions.

Balanced usageMulti-role
Peer percentiles
Opponent-adjusted EPA (WEPA/play)100th %ile · elite
Game-to-game consistency56th %ile · average
Key findings
  • Top-10% efficiency among TEs — elite opponent-adjusted EPA rate.
  • Limited usage share suggests a rotational or specialist role.
  • 6 high-impact games (EPA/play > 0.4) this season — elite ceiling.
  • Particularly dangerous on passing downs — efficiency spikes in obvious pass situations.
  • Strong second-half surge — EPA/play improved 0.27 from the first to second half of the season.
  • Peak game: 2.88 EPA/play in Wk 10 vs Clemson (SP+ 10).

NIL Market Tier· 2025

On3 valuation ↗
Elite

Top-3 player at position nationally. Collective + national brand deals.

Tier is a model estimate based on position, school brand, performance rank, and usage — not a reported deal. NIL deals are private. For a real market valuation, see On3's NIL profile, which factors in social following and actual deal tracking.

Historical Comparables · TE · efficiency + volume + value

Players from 2014–2024 matched on EPA efficiency, play volume, and adjusted value tier — not just one metric.

PlayerTeamYrPlaysWEPA/playLine valTotal EPA
Ty ThompsonTulane2024480.4200.420.2
Seth GreenMinnesota2018830.3900.032.4
Johnny LanganRutgers2020590.3000.017.7
Evan SvobodaWyoming2024750.2900.021.8
Jordan MyersRice2021590.2700.215.9

Comps are statistical — efficiency, volume, and value tier all factor in. Style and conference context differ.

Game Log · box score + EPA, week by week

Wk 1 vs Elon: +0.06 EPA/play1Wk 2 vs Illinois: -0.23 EPA/play2Wk 3 vs Tulane: -0.11 EPA/play3Wk 4 vs NC State: +1.41 EPA/play4Wk 5 vs Syracuse: +0.11 EPA/play5Wk 8 vs Georgia Tech: +0.26 EPA/play8Wk 10 vs Clemson: +2.88 EPA/play10Wk 11 vs UConn: +0.29 EPA/play11Wk 12 vs Virginia: +0.98 EPA/play12Wk 13 vs North Carolina: +0.55 EPA/play13Wk 14 vs Wake Forest: +1.16 EPA/play14Wk 15 vs Virginia: -0.33 EPA/play15Wk 1 vs Arizona State: +0.47 EPA/play1
EPA per play, by weekabove 0 = added points · below = lost
WkOpponentResultOpp SP+RecRec YdsAvgRec TDLongEPA/play
1vsElonW45-17155.0050.06
2vsIllinoisL19-4512.9166.006-0.23
3@TulaneL27-346.32147.007-0.11
4vsNC StateW45-334.844310.80211.41
5@SyracuseW38-3-13.1155.0050.11
8vsGeorgia TechL18-279.3199.0090.26
10@ClemsonW46-459.538327.70562.88
11@UConnL34-375.146115.31260.29
12vsVirginiaL17-3411.134715.70300.98
13@North CarolinaW32-25-6.678512.11270.55
14vsWake ForestW49-325.74276.81111.16
15vsVirginiaW27-2011.13196.3212-0.33
1vsArizona StateW42-393.96508.31140.47

Usage & Situational · Pro

Snap-share proxy
Overall
5.3%
Passing plays
9.8%
Rushing plays
0.0%
Standard downs
4.6%
Passing downs
7.1%
EPA by down type
Standard downs
0.48
Passing downs
0.79
Pass / Rush EPA
0.60 / —

Usage = share of team plays (CFBD has no true snap counts).

EPA = expected points added (opponent-adjusted). NIL estimates are model-based ranges, not reported deals. Data: CollegeFootballData. Not betting advice.