#4Jeremiyah Love
Jeremiyah Love is a Featured Back for Notre Dame. Jeremiyah's 2025 season ranks in the 15th percentile nationally by opponent-adjusted EPA per play across 210 plays — a developing rate for the RB.
2026 Usage Outlook · projected share of team plays
Regressed toward the RB mean. Model correlation r≈0.52 on a 2019-2025 walk-forward — volume only; efficiency not projected.
2025 Production
Performance Analysis · 2025 · vs RB peers
The centerpiece of the run game — high carry volume, used in early downs and goal-line, true workhorse role.
- ▸Below-average efficiency vs RB peers — value comes through volume, not per-play impact.
- ▸High-volume role — one of the team's most-used RBs by play share.
- ▸High game-to-game consistency — reliable floor each week.
- ▸3 high-impact games (EPA/play > 0.4) this season — elite ceiling.
- ▸Particularly dangerous on passing downs — efficiency spikes in obvious pass situations.
- ▸Peak game: 0.56 EPA/play in Wk 5 vs Arkansas (SP+ 5).
NIL Market Tier· 2025
On3 valuation ↗Top-10 nationally. Multiple mid-to-large collective deals expected.
Tier is a model estimate based on position, school brand, performance rank, and usage — not a reported deal. NIL deals are private. For a real market valuation, see On3's NIL profile, which factors in social following and actual deal tracking.
Historical Comparables · RB · efficiency + volume + value
Players from 2014–2024 matched on EPA efficiency, play volume, and adjusted value tier — not just one metric.
| Player | Team | Yr | Plays | WEPA/play | Line val | Total EPA |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Saquon Barkley | Penn State | 2016 | 288 | 0.340 | 3.9 | 97.9 |
| Dalvin Cook | Florida State | 2016 | 292 | 0.340 | 4.3 | 99.3 |
| Breece Hall | Iowa State | 2020 | 301 | 0.340 | 4.5 | 102.3 |
| Hassan Haskins | Michigan | 2021 | 280 | 0.380 | 4.8 | 106.4 |
| James Flanders | Tulsa | 2016 | 266 | 0.390 | 4.9 | 103.7 |
Comps are statistical — efficiency, volume, and value tier all factor in. Style and conference context differ.
Game Log · box score + EPA, week by week
| Wk | Opponent | Result | Opp SP+ | Car | Rush Yds | Avg | Rush TD | Rec | Rec Yds | Rec TD | EPA/play |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | @Miami | L24-27 | 20.7 | 10 | 33 | 3.3 | 0 | 4 | 26 | 0 | -0.05 |
| 3 | vsTexas A&M | L40-41 | 20.7 | 23 | 94 | 4.1 | 1 | 4 | 53 | 1 | 0.11 |
| 4 | vsPurdue | W56-30 | -6.1 | 19 | 157 | 8.3 | 2 | — | — | — | 0.45 |
| 5 | @Arkansas | W56-13 | 5.1 | 14 | 57 | 4.1 | 2 | 5 | 70 | 2 | 0.56 |
| 6 | vsBoise State | W28-7 | 3.1 | 16 | 103 | 6.4 | 1 | 1 | 11 | 0 | 0.06 |
| 7 | vsNC State | W36-7 | 4.8 | 18 | 86 | 4.8 | 2 | — | — | — | 0.22 |
| 8 | vsUSC | W34-24 | 16.9 | 24 | 228 | 9.5 | 1 | 5 | 37 | 0 | 0.46 |
| 10 | @Boston College | W25-10 | -8.5 | 17 | 136 | 8.0 | 2 | 4 | 30 | 0 | 0.24 |
| 11 | vsNavy | W49-10 | 6.2 | 13 | 94 | 7.2 | 2 | 1 | 27 | 0 | 0.32 |
| 12 | @Pittsburgh | W37-15 | 8.4 | 23 | 147 | 6.4 | 1 | 2 | 20 | 0 | 0.02 |
| 13 | vsSyracuse | W70-7 | -13.1 | 8 | 171 | 21.4 | 3 | — | — | — | 0.26 |
| 14 | @Stanford | W49-20 | -11.8 | 14 | 66 | 4.7 | 1 | 1 | 6 | 0 | -0.13 |
Usage & Situational · Pro
- Standard downs
- 0.17
- Passing downs
- 0.51
- Pass / Rush EPA
- 0.63 / 0.19
Usage = share of team plays (CFBD has no true snap counts).
Career · rolling EPA, game by game
Chart shows per-game EPA (bars) and rolling 5-game average (line). Season breaks marked with dashed lines. Line value = est. points over replacement per game.