Scores
Dev
← Player leaders
John Mateer

#10John Mateer

John Mateer is a Clutch Passer for Oklahoma. John's 2025 season ranks in the 0th percentile nationally by opponent-adjusted EPA per play across 522 plays — a developing rate for the QB.

2026 Usage Outlook · projected share of team plays

51%
projected
band 33%'25 66%69%

Regressed toward the QB mean. Model correlation r≈0.46 on a 2019-2025 walk-forward — volume only; efficiency not projected.

2025 Production

Passing
247/397 Comp/Att2885 Pass yards14 Pass TD11 INT62.2% Comp %
Rushing
431 Rush yards8 Rush TD149 Carries2.9 Yards/carry
Punting
1 Punts40 Punt yards40.0 Yards/punt40 Long1 Inside 20

Performance Analysis · 2025 · vs QB peers

EfficiencyVolumeDual-ThreatConsistencyClutch
Player type
Clutch Passer

Elevates on passing downs — 3rd-and-medium, two-minute drills, and pressure situations are where this QB is best.

3rd-down precisionLate-game valueHigh passing-down EPA
Peer percentiles
Opponent-adjusted EPA (WEPA/play)0th %ile · below avg
Game-to-game consistency69th %ile · average
Key findings
  • Below-average efficiency vs QB peers — value comes through volume, not per-play impact.
  • High-volume role — one of the team's most-used QBs by play share.
  • Particularly dangerous on passing downs — efficiency spikes in obvious pass situations.
  • Production faded as the season progressed — 0.24 EPA/play decline from first to second half.
  • Peak game: 0.66 EPA/play in Wk 1 vs Illinois State.

NIL Market Tier· 2025

On3 valuation ↗
Starter

Meaningful starter. Local collective + position-group deals.

Tier is a model estimate based on position, school brand, performance rank, and usage — not a reported deal. NIL deals are private. For a real market valuation, see On3's NIL profile, which factors in social following and actual deal tracking.

Game Log · box score + EPA, week by week

Wk 1 vs Illinois State: +0.66 EPA/play1Wk 2 vs Michigan: +0.35 EPA/play2Wk 3 vs Temple: +0.39 EPA/play3Wk 4 vs Auburn: +0.30 EPA/play4Wk 7 vs Texas: -0.07 EPA/play7Wk 8 vs South Carolina: +0.35 EPA/play8Wk 9 vs Ole Miss: -0.02 EPA/play9Wk 10 vs Tennessee: +0.11 EPA/play10Wk 12 vs Alabama: +0.16 EPA/play12Wk 13 vs Missouri: -0.17 EPA/play13Wk 14 vs LSU: +0.27 EPA/play14Wk 1 vs Alabama: +0.17 EPA/play1
EPA per play, by weekabove 0 = added points · below = lost
WkOpponentResultOpp SP+C/ATTPass YdsPass TDINTQBRRush YdsRush TDEPA/play
1vsIllinois StateW35-330/373923180.02410.66
2vsMichiganW24-1312.421/342701179.27420.35
3@TempleW42-3-5.120/342821172.46310.39
4vsAuburnW24-1711.624/362711065.82910.30
7vsTexasL6-2316.220/382020342.850-0.07
8@South CarolinaW26-75.918/261501087.51400.35
9vsOle MissL26-3424.017/312231045.1170-0.02
10@TennesseeW33-2715.019/291590172.38010.11
12@AlabamaW23-2114.815/231380071.72310.16
13vsMissouriW17-614.414/301732067.6600-0.17
14vsLSUW17-1310.323/383182354.02700.27
1vsAlabamaL24-3414.826/413072172.31510.17

Usage & Situational · Pro

Snap-share proxy
Overall
66.3%
Passing plays
97.2%
Rushing plays
33.1%
Standard downs
58.6%
Passing downs
81.5%
EPA by down type
Standard downs
0.08
Passing downs
0.33
Pass / Rush EPA
0.20 / 0.15

Usage = share of team plays (CFBD has no true snap counts).

Career · rolling EPA, game by game

Per-game EPA5-game avg
2024 · 12 games

Chart shows per-game EPA (bars) and rolling 5-game average (line). Season breaks marked with dashed lines. Line value = est. points over replacement per game.

EPA = expected points added (opponent-adjusted). NIL estimates are model-based ranges, not reported deals. Data: CollegeFootballData. Not betting advice.