Scores
Dev
← Player leaders
Jordan Napier

#2Jordan Napier

Jordan Napier is a Versatile WR for San Diego State. Jordan's 2025 season ranks in the 100th percentile nationally by opponent-adjusted EPA per play across 63 plays — a elite rate for the WR.

2026 Usage Outlook · projected share of team plays

10%
projected
band 6%'25 12%13%

Regressed toward the WR mean. Model correlation r≈0.47 on a 2019-2025 walk-forward — volume only; efficiency not projected.

2025 Production

Rushing
40 Rush yards1 Rush TD11 Carries3.6 Yards/carry
Receiving
48 Receptions632 Rec yards2 Rec TD13.2 Yards/rec
Returns
12 Kick returns265 KR yards0 KR TD22 Punt returns193 PR yards1 PR TD

Performance Analysis · 2025 · vs WR peers

EfficiencyVolumeExplosivenessConsistencyPass-Down
Player type
Versatile WR

Balanced profile without a single dominant trait — contributes across multiple dimensions.

Balanced usageMulti-role
Peer percentiles
Opponent-adjusted EPA (WEPA/play)100th %ile · elite
Game-to-game consistency46th %ile · average
Key findings
  • Top-10% efficiency among WRs — elite opponent-adjusted EPA rate.
  • 5 high-impact games (EPA/play > 0.4) this season — elite ceiling.
  • Particularly dangerous on passing downs — efficiency spikes in obvious pass situations.
  • Peak game: 1.73 EPA/play in Wk 6 vs Colorado State (SP+ -16).

NIL Market Tier· 2025

On3 valuation ↗
Elite

Top-3 player at position nationally. Collective + national brand deals.

Tier is a model estimate based on position, school brand, performance rank, and usage — not a reported deal. NIL deals are private. For a real market valuation, see On3's NIL profile, which factors in social following and actual deal tracking.

Historical Comparables · WR · efficiency + volume + value

Players from 2014–2024 matched on EPA efficiency, play volume, and adjusted value tier — not just one metric.

PlayerTeamYrPlaysWEPA/playLine valTotal EPA
Dane KinamonAir Force2021390.4100.716.0
Savion WilliamsTCU2024560.4501.125.2
Keytaon ThompsonMississippi State2017700.4601.232.2
Micah DavisAir Force2021440.3700.616.3
JoJo NatsonUtah State2014510.3901.019.9

Comps are statistical — efficiency, volume, and value tier all factor in. Style and conference context differ.

Game Log · box score + EPA, week by week

Wk 1 vs Stony Brook: -0.58 EPA/play1Wk 2 vs Washington State: -0.11 EPA/play2Wk 4 vs California: +0.97 EPA/play4Wk 5 vs Northern Illinois: +0.23 EPA/play5Wk 6 vs Colorado State: +1.73 EPA/play6Wk 7 vs Nevada: +1.50 EPA/play7Wk 10 vs Wyoming: +0.54 EPA/play10Wk 11 vs Hawai'i: +1.07 EPA/play11Wk 12 vs Boise State: -1.01 EPA/play12
EPA per play, by weekabove 0 = added points · below = lost
WkOpponentResultOpp SP+RecRec YdsAvgRec TDLongEPA/play
1vsStony BrookW42-03186.008-0.58
2@Washington StateL13-363.87699.9023-0.11
4vsCaliforniaW34-0-3.2915417.11800.97
5@Northern IllinoisW6-3-16.76528.70190.23
6vsColorado StateW45-24-15.6715321.91611.73
7@NevadaW44-10-13.4511022.00411.50
9@Fresno StateW23-01.84143.507
10vsWyomingW24-7-11.344310.80220.54
11@Hawai'iL6-381.722110.50131.07
12vsBoise StateW17-73.11-2-2.000-1.01

Usage & Situational · Pro

Snap-share proxy
Overall
12.0%
Passing plays
29.0%
Rushing plays
2.5%
Standard downs
12.3%
Passing downs
11.4%
EPA by down type
Standard downs
0.41
Passing downs
0.57
Pass / Rush EPA
0.49 / 0.20

Usage = share of team plays (CFBD has no true snap counts).

EPA = expected points added (opponent-adjusted). NIL estimates are model-based ranges, not reported deals. Data: CollegeFootballData. Not betting advice.