#10Julian Sayin

QB·Ohio State·2025

Julian Sayin is a Clutch Passer for Ohio State. Julian's 2025 season ranks in the 50th percentile nationally by opponent-adjusted EPA per play across 404 plays — a average rate for the QB.

2026 Usage Outlook · projected share of team plays

42%

projected

band 24%'25 47%60%

Regressed toward the QB mean. Model correlation r≈0.46 on a 2019-2025 walk-forward — volume only; efficiency not projected.

2025 Production

Passing

301/391 Comp/Att3610 Pass yards32 Pass TD8 INT77.0% Comp %

Rushing

-44 Rush yards0 Rush TD42 Carries-1.0 Yards/carry

Performance Analysis · 2025 · vs QB peers

Player type

Clutch Passer

Elevates on passing downs — 3rd-and-medium, two-minute drills, and pressure situations are where this QB is best.

3rd-down precisionLate-game valueHigh passing-down EPA

Peer percentiles

Opponent-adjusted EPA (WEPA/play)50th %ile · average

Game-to-game consistency87th %ile · above avg

Key findings

▸High-volume role — one of the team's most-used QBs by play share.
▸High game-to-game consistency — reliable floor each week.
▸9 high-impact games (EPA/play > 0.4) this season — elite ceiling.
▸Particularly dangerous on passing downs — efficiency spikes in obvious pass situations.
▸Production faded as the season progressed — 0.18 EPA/play decline from first to second half.
▸Peak game: 0.84 EPA/play in Wk 6 vs Minnesota (SP+ 2).

NIL Market Tier· 2025

On3 valuation ↗

Elite

Top-3 player at position nationally. Collective + national brand deals.

Tier is a model estimate based on position, school brand, performance rank, and usage — not a reported deal. NIL deals are private. For a real market valuation, see On3's NIL profile, which factors in social following and actual deal tracking.

Game Log · box score + EPA, week by week

EPA per play, by weekabove 0 = added points · below = lost

Wk	Opponent	Result	Opp SP+	C/ATT	Pass Yds	Pass TD	INT	QBR	Rush Yds	Rush TD	EPA/play
1	vsTexas	W14-7	16.2	13/20	126	1	0	74.5	2	0	0.27
2	vsGrambling	W70-0	—	18/19	306	4	1	75.6	-7	0	0.65
3	vsOhio	W37-9	-4.0	25/32	347	3	2	77.5	-2	0	0.52
5	@Washington	W24-6	18.4	22/28	208	2	0	88.9	12	0	0.58
6	vsMinnesota	W42-3	1.5	23/27	326	3	0	97.4	2	0	0.84
7	@Illinois	W34-16	12.9	19/27	166	2	0	86.0	3	0	0.57
8	@Wisconsin	W34-0	-4.4	36/42	393	4	0	94.2	7	0	0.70
10	vsPenn State	W38-14	18.1	20/23	316	4	0	99.1	13	0	0.84
11	@Purdue	W34-10	-6.1	27/33	303	1	1	87.5	-9	0	0.21
12	vsUCLA	W48-10	-8.7	23/31	184	1	0	82.1	-1	0	0.26
13	vsRutgers	W42-9	1.0	13/19	157	2	0	83.3	—	—	0.57
14	@Michigan	W27-9	12.4	19/26	233	3	1	97.0	7	0	0.57
15	vsIndiana	L10-13	32.4	21/29	258	1	1	60.7	-29	0	0.18
1	vsMiami	L14-24	20.7	22/35	287	1	2	70.4	-42	0	0.21

Usage & Situational · Pro

Snap-share proxy

Overall

47.3%

Passing plays

93.4%

Rushing plays

5.3%

Standard downs

42.1%

Passing downs

65.0%

EPA by down type

Standard downs: 0.39
Passing downs: 0.62
Pass / Rush EPA: 0.51 / -0.05

Usage = share of team plays (CFBD has no true snap counts).