#7Jyrin Johnson

TE·Bowling Green·2025

Jyrin Johnson is a Slot Specialist TE for Bowling Green. Jyrin's 2025 season ranks in the 50th percentile nationally by opponent-adjusted EPA per play across 51 plays — a average rate for the TE.

2026 Usage Outlook · projected share of team plays

projected

band 3%'25 8%7%

Regressed toward the TE mean. Model correlation r≈0.42 on a 2019-2025 walk-forward — volume only; efficiency not projected.

2025 Production

Receiving

37 Receptions466 Rec yards2 Rec TD12.6 Yards/rec

Performance Analysis · 2025 · vs TE peers

Player type

Slot Specialist TE

The offense's primary passing-down weapon — routes, separation, and reliability on 3rd down define this role.

3rd-down converterRoute technicianHigh passing-down share

Peer percentiles

Opponent-adjusted EPA (WEPA/play)50th %ile · average

Game-to-game consistency76th %ile · above avg

Key findings

▸Limited usage share suggests a rotational or specialist role.
▸High game-to-game consistency — reliable floor each week.
▸5 high-impact games (EPA/play > 0.4) this season — elite ceiling.
▸Peak game: 0.99 EPA/play in Wk 2 vs Cincinnati (SP+ 5).

NIL Market Tier· 2025

On3 valuation ↗

Star

Top-10 nationally. Multiple mid-to-large collective deals expected.

Tier is a model estimate based on position, school brand, performance rank, and usage — not a reported deal. NIL deals are private. For a real market valuation, see On3's NIL profile, which factors in social following and actual deal tracking.

Historical Comparables · TE · efficiency + volume + value

Players from 2014–2024 matched on EPA efficiency, play volume, and adjusted value tier — not just one metric.

Player	Team	Yr	Plays	WEPA/play	Line val	Total EPA
Ty Thompson	Tulane	2024	48	0.420	0.4	20.2
Seth Green	Minnesota	2018	83	0.390	0.0	32.4
Johnny Langan	Rutgers	2020	59	0.300	0.0	17.7
Evan Svoboda	Wyoming	2024	75	0.290	0.0	21.8
Jordan Myers	Rice	2021	59	0.270	0.2	15.9

Comps are statistical — efficiency, volume, and value tier all factor in. Style and conference context differ.

Game Log · box score + EPA, week by week

EPA per play, by weekabove 0 = added points · below = lost

Wk	Opponent	Result	Opp SP+	Rec	Rec Yds	Avg	Rec TD	Long	EPA/play
1	vsLafayette	W26-7	—	1	22	22.0	0	22	0.83
2	@Cincinnati	L20-34	4.5	7	80	11.4	1	31	0.99
3	vsLiberty	W23-13	-9.0	2	36	18.0	0	21	0.87
4	@Louisville	L17-40	12.4	1	21	21.0	0	21	-0.02
5	@Ohio	L20-35	-4.0	1	5	5.0	0	5	-0.14
7	vsToledo	W28-23	6.0	3	25	8.3	0	16	0.35
8	vsCentral Michigan	L6-27	-8.8	5	36	7.2	0	17	0.20
9	@Kent State	L21-24	-19.3	3	53	17.7	0	29	—
10	vsBuffalo	L3-28	-7.5	5	69	13.8	0	22	0.29
11	@Eastern Michigan	L21-27	-14.7	4	36	9.0	1	23	0.33
13	vsAkron	L16-19	-13.9	3	63	21.0	0	38	0.48
14	@Massachusetts	W45-14	-36.6	2	20	10.0	0	10	0.79

Usage & Situational · Pro

Snap-share proxy

Overall

7.9%

Passing plays

19.6%

Rushing plays

0.0%

Standard downs

4.6%

Passing downs

14.2%

EPA by down type

Standard downs: 0.36
Passing downs: 0.43
Pass / Rush EPA: 0.40 / —

Usage = share of team plays (CFBD has no true snap counts).