#85Luke Reynolds

TE·Penn State·2025

Luke Reynolds is a Versatile TE for Penn State. Luke's 2025 season produced 15.9 total EPA across 32 plays.

2026 Usage Outlook · projected share of team plays

projected

band 2%'25 5%6%

Regressed toward the TE mean. Model correlation r≈0.42 on a 2019-2025 walk-forward — volume only; efficiency not projected.

2025 Production

Receiving

26 Receptions257 Rec yards0 Rec TD9.9 Yards/rec

Performance Analysis · 2025 · vs TE peers

Player type

Versatile TE

Balanced profile without a single dominant trait — contributes across multiple dimensions.

Balanced usageMulti-role

Peer percentiles

Opponent-adjusted EPA (WEPA/play)100th %ile · elite

Game-to-game consistency60th %ile · average

Key findings

▸Top-10% efficiency among TEs — elite opponent-adjusted EPA rate.
▸Limited usage share suggests a rotational or specialist role.
▸6 high-impact games (EPA/play > 0.4) this season — elite ceiling.
▸Strong second-half surge — EPA/play improved 0.36 from the first to second half of the season.
▸Peak game: 3.71 EPA/play in Wk 13 vs Nebraska (SP+ 6).

NIL Market Tier· 2025

On3 valuation ↗

Elite

Top-3 player at position nationally. Collective + national brand deals.

Tier is a model estimate based on position, school brand, performance rank, and usage — not a reported deal. NIL deals are private. For a real market valuation, see On3's NIL profile, which factors in social following and actual deal tracking.

Historical Comparables · TE · efficiency + volume + value

Players from 2014–2024 matched on EPA efficiency, play volume, and adjusted value tier — not just one metric.

Player	Team	Yr	Plays	WEPA/play	Line val	Total EPA
Ty Thompson	Tulane	2024	48	0.420	0.4	20.2
Seth Green	Minnesota	2018	83	0.390	0.0	32.4
Johnny Langan	Rutgers	2020	59	0.300	0.0	17.7
Evan Svoboda	Wyoming	2024	75	0.290	0.0	21.8
Jordan Myers	Rice	2021	59	0.270	0.2	15.9

Comps are statistical — efficiency, volume, and value tier all factor in. Style and conference context differ.

Game Log · box score + EPA, week by week

EPA per play, by weekabove 0 = added points · below = lost

Wk	Opponent	Result	Opp SP+	Rec	Rec Yds	Avg	Rec TD	Long	EPA/play
1	vsNevada	W46-11	-13.4	2	11	5.5	0	8	0.43
2	vsFlorida International	W34-0	-10.5	7	58	8.3	0	14	0.83
3	vsVillanova	W52-6	—	4	73	18.3	0	22	1.31
5	vsOregon	L24-30	25.9	1	9	9.0	0	9	-0.06
6	@UCLA	L37-42	-8.7	4	46	11.5	0	17	0.51
8	@Iowa	L24-25	19.7	3	16	5.3	0	7	-0.06
11	vsIndiana	L24-27	32.4	1	5	5.0	0	5	0.11
13	vsNebraska	W37-10	6.2	—	—	—	—	—	3.71
14	@Rutgers	W40-36	1.0	2	11	5.5	0	9	0.31
1	vsClemson	W22-10	9.5	2	28	14.0	0	17	0.73

Usage & Situational · Pro

Snap-share proxy

Overall

4.9%

Passing plays

10.5%

Rushing plays

0.5%

Standard downs

5.1%

Passing downs

4.4%

EPA by down type

Standard downs: 0.52
Passing downs: 0.43
Pass / Rush EPA: 0.42 / 1.62

Usage = share of team plays (CFBD has no true snap counts).