Scores
Dev
← Player leaders
Malik Rutherford

#8Malik Rutherford

Malik Rutherford is a Versatile WR for Georgia Tech. Malik's 2025 season produced 34.7 total EPA across 49 plays.

2026 Usage Outlook · projected share of team plays

7%
projected
band 4%'25 7%11%

Regressed toward the WR mean. Model correlation r≈0.47 on a 2019-2025 walk-forward — volume only; efficiency not projected.

2025 Production

Receiving
46 Receptions523 Rec yards3 Rec TD11.4 Yards/rec

Performance Analysis · 2025 · vs WR peers

EfficiencyVolumeExplosivenessConsistencyPass-Down
Player type
Versatile WR

Balanced profile without a single dominant trait — contributes across multiple dimensions.

Balanced usageMulti-role
Peer percentiles
Opponent-adjusted EPA (WEPA/play)100th %ile · elite
Game-to-game consistency74th %ile · average
Key findings
  • Top-10% efficiency among WRs — elite opponent-adjusted EPA rate.
  • Limited usage share suggests a rotational or specialist role.
  • High game-to-game consistency — reliable floor each week.
  • 7 high-impact games (EPA/play > 0.4) this season — elite ceiling.
  • Particularly dangerous on passing downs — efficiency spikes in obvious pass situations.
  • Peak game: 1.28 EPA/play in Wk 4 vs Temple (SP+ -5).

NIL Market Tier· 2025

On3 valuation ↗
Elite

Top-3 player at position nationally. Collective + national brand deals.

Tier is a model estimate based on position, school brand, performance rank, and usage — not a reported deal. NIL deals are private. For a real market valuation, see On3's NIL profile, which factors in social following and actual deal tracking.

Historical Comparables · WR · efficiency + volume + value

Players from 2014–2024 matched on EPA efficiency, play volume, and adjusted value tier — not just one metric.

PlayerTeamYrPlaysWEPA/playLine valTotal EPA
Quadree HendersonPittsburgh2016630.5301.633.4
DeAndre HughesAir Force2021600.4701.328.2
Keytaon ThompsonMississippi State2017700.4601.232.2
Savion WilliamsTCU2024560.4501.125.2
Javion PoseyFlorida Atlantic2020530.4501.423.8

Comps are statistical — efficiency, volume, and value tier all factor in. Style and conference context differ.

Game Log · box score + EPA, week by week

Wk 1 vs Colorado: +1.13 EPA/play1Wk 3 vs Clemson: -0.05 EPA/play3Wk 4 vs Temple: +1.28 EPA/play4Wk 5 vs Wake Forest: +0.05 EPA/play5Wk 7 vs Virginia Tech: +1.09 EPA/play7Wk 8 vs Duke: -0.45 EPA/play8Wk 12 vs Boston College: +0.90 EPA/play12Wk 13 vs Pittsburgh: +0.80 EPA/play13Wk 14 vs Georgia: +0.79 EPA/play14Wk 1 vs BYU: +0.89 EPA/play1
EPA per play, by weekabove 0 = added points · below = lost
WkOpponentResultOpp SP+RecRec YdsAvgRec TDLongEPA/play
1@ColoradoW27-20-8.31.13
2vsGardner-WebbW59-1256212.4026
3vsClemsonW24-219.54225.509-0.05
4vsTempleW45-24-5.123316.51241.28
5@Wake ForestW30-295.75387.60190.05
7vsVirginia TechW35-20-10.16498.21161.09
8@DukeW27-186.61-2-2.00-2-0.45
12@Boston CollegeW36-34-8.5512124.21710.90
13vsPittsburghL28-428.466811.30200.80
14vsGeorgiaL9-1624.14276.8090.79
1vsBYUL21-2515.9810513.10280.89

Usage & Situational · Pro

Snap-share proxy
Overall
7.4%
Passing plays
14.1%
Rushing plays
2.0%
Standard downs
6.9%
Passing downs
8.8%
EPA by down type
Standard downs
0.59
Passing downs
0.97
Pass / Rush EPA
0.73 / 0.57

Usage = share of team plays (CFBD has no true snap counts).

EPA = expected points added (opponent-adjusted). NIL estimates are model-based ranges, not reported deals. Data: CollegeFootballData. Not betting advice.