← Player leaders
Miller Moss is a Dual-Threat QB for USC. Miller's 2024 season ranks in the 0th percentile nationally by opponent-adjusted EPA per play across 384 plays — a developing rate for the QB.
2024 Production
Passing
233/362 Comp/Att2555 Pass yards18 Pass TD9 INT64.4% Comp %
Rushing
-18 Rush yards2 Rush TD21 Carries-0.9 Yards/carry
Punting
1 Punts39 Punt yards39.0 Yards/punt39 Long1 Inside 20
Performance Analysis · 2024 · vs QB peers
Player type
Dual-Threat QB
A genuine rushing threat who stresses defenses horizontally. Extends plays with legs and forces extra gap assignments.
Rushing threatScrambles for valueStresses defensive structure
Peer percentiles
Opponent-adjusted EPA (WEPA/play)0th %ile · below avg
Game-to-game consistency77th %ile · above avg
Key findings
- ▸Below-average efficiency vs QB peers — value comes through volume, not per-play impact.
- ▸High-volume role — one of the team's most-used QBs by play share.
- ▸High game-to-game consistency — reliable floor each week.
- ▸3 high-impact games (EPA/play > 0.4) this season — elite ceiling.
- ▸Particularly dangerous on passing downs — efficiency spikes in obvious pass situations.
- ▸Peak game: 0.70 EPA/play in Wk 9 vs Rutgers (SP+ 6).
NIL Market Tier· 2024
On3 valuation ↗Star
Top-10 nationally. Multiple mid-to-large collective deals expected.
Tier is a model estimate based on position, school brand, performance rank, and usage — not a reported deal. NIL deals are private. For a real market valuation, see On3's NIL profile, which factors in social following and actual deal tracking.
Game Log · box score + EPA, week by week
EPA per play, by weekabove 0 = added points · below = lost
| Wk | Opponent | Result | Opp SP+ | C/ATT | Pass Yds | Pass TD | INT | QBR | Rush Yds | Rush TD | EPA/play |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | vsLSU | W27-20 | 15.9 | 27/36 | 378 | 1 | 0 | 79.2 | -8 | 0 | 0.58 |
| 2 | vsUtah State | W48-0 | -10.4 | 21/30 | 229 | 1 | 0 | 70.3 | 7 | 0 | 0.30 |
| 4 | @Michigan | L24-27 | 10.6 | 28/51 | 283 | 3 | 1 | 55.2 | -27 | 0 | 0.01 |
| 5 | vsWisconsin | W38-21 | 3.0 | 30/45 | 308 | 3 | 1 | 79.5 | 17 | 1 | 0.45 |
| 6 | @Minnesota | L17-24 | 10.4 | 23/38 | 200 | 1 | 2 | 67.7 | -9 | 0 | 0.21 |
| 7 | vsPenn State | L30-33 | 24.6 | 20/34 | 220 | 2 | 1 | 79.4 | -4 | 0 | 0.27 |
| 8 | @Maryland | L28-29 | -3.9 | 34/50 | 336 | 3 | 1 | 74.4 | -6 | 0 | 0.25 |
| 9 | vsRutgers | W42-20 | 6.4 | 20/28 | 308 | 2 | 0 | 92.8 | 7 | 1 | 0.70 |
| 10 | @Washington | L21-26 | 3.1 | 30/50 | 293 | 2 | 3 | 70.6 | 5 | 0 | -0.07 |
Usage & Situational · Pro
Snap-share proxy
Overall
61.1%
Passing plays
96.6%
Rushing plays
5.7%
Standard downs
56.1%
Passing downs
73.6%
EPA by down type
- Standard downs
- 0.10
- Passing downs
- 0.56
- Pass / Rush EPA
- 0.26 / 0.31
Usage = share of team plays (CFBD has no true snap counts).