Scores
Dev
← Player leaders
Noah Meyers

#81Noah Meyers

Noah Meyers is a Versatile TE for Western Kentucky. Noah's 2025 season produced 22.8 total EPA across 37 plays.

2026 Usage Outlook · projected share of team plays

4%
projected
band 2%'25 5%6%

Regressed toward the TE mean. Model correlation r≈0.42 on a 2019-2025 walk-forward — volume only; efficiency not projected.

2025 Production

Receiving
32 Receptions357 Rec yards3 Rec TD11.2 Yards/rec

Performance Analysis · 2025 · vs TE peers

EfficiencyVolumeExplosivenessConsistencyPass-Down
Player type
Versatile TE

Balanced profile without a single dominant trait — contributes across multiple dimensions.

Balanced usageMulti-role
Peer percentiles
Opponent-adjusted EPA (WEPA/play)100th %ile · elite
Game-to-game consistency65th %ile · average
Key findings
  • Top-10% efficiency among TEs — elite opponent-adjusted EPA rate.
  • Limited usage share suggests a rotational or specialist role.
  • 8 high-impact games (EPA/play > 0.4) this season — elite ceiling.
  • Particularly dangerous on passing downs — efficiency spikes in obvious pass situations.
  • Production faded as the season progressed — 0.27 EPA/play decline from first to second half.
  • Peak game: 1.56 EPA/play in Wk 12 vs Middle Tennessee (SP+ -16).

NIL Market Tier· 2025

On3 valuation ↗
Elite

Top-3 player at position nationally. Collective + national brand deals.

Tier is a model estimate based on position, school brand, performance rank, and usage — not a reported deal. NIL deals are private. For a real market valuation, see On3's NIL profile, which factors in social following and actual deal tracking.

Historical Comparables · TE · efficiency + volume + value

Players from 2014–2024 matched on EPA efficiency, play volume, and adjusted value tier — not just one metric.

PlayerTeamYrPlaysWEPA/playLine valTotal EPA
Ty ThompsonTulane2024480.4200.420.2
Seth GreenMinnesota2018830.3900.032.4
Johnny LanganRutgers2020590.3000.017.7
Evan SvobodaWyoming2024750.2900.021.8
Jordan MyersRice2021590.2700.215.9

Comps are statistical — efficiency, volume, and value tier all factor in. Style and conference context differ.

Game Log · box score + EPA, week by week

Wk 1 vs Sam Houston: +0.60 EPA/play1Wk 1 vs North Alabama: +0.60 EPA/play1Wk 2 vs Toledo: +0.59 EPA/play2Wk 4 vs Nevada: +1.06 EPA/play4Wk 5 vs Missouri State: +0.71 EPA/play5Wk 6 vs Delaware: -0.25 EPA/play6Wk 8 vs Florida International: +0.63 EPA/play8Wk 12 vs Middle Tennessee: +1.56 EPA/play12Wk 13 vs LSU: +0.21 EPA/play13Wk 14 vs Jacksonville State: +0.58 EPA/play14Wk 1 vs Southern Miss: -0.76 EPA/play1
EPA per play, by weekabove 0 = added points · below = lost
WkOpponentResultOpp SP+RecRec YdsAvgRec TDLongEPA/play
1vsSam HoustonW41-24-27.8133.0030.60
1vsNorth AlabamaW55-64235.80120.60
2@ToledoL21-456.011717.00170.59
4vsNevadaW31-16-13.468113.50211.06
5@Missouri StateW27-22-10.736822.71390.71
6@DelawareW27-24-10.91-3-3.000-0.25
8vsFlorida InternationalL6-25-10.555310.60170.63
12vsMiddle TennesseeW42-26-16.04205.0281.56
13@LSUL10-1310.32126.0080.21
14@Jacksonville StateL34-37-6.73186.00150.58
1vsSouthern MissW27-16-7.126532.5062-0.76

Usage & Situational · Pro

Snap-share proxy
Overall
4.9%
Passing plays
8.6%
Rushing plays
0.0%
Standard downs
5.4%
Passing downs
3.6%
EPA by down type
Standard downs
0.45
Passing downs
1.14
Pass / Rush EPA
0.61 / —

Usage = share of team plays (CFBD has no true snap counts).

EPA = expected points added (opponent-adjusted). NIL estimates are model-based ranges, not reported deals. Data: CollegeFootballData. Not betting advice.