Scores
Dev
← Player leaders
Parker Kingston

#11Parker Kingston

WR·BYU·2025

Parker Kingston is a Versatile WR for BYU. Parker's 2025 season ranks in the 88th percentile nationally by opponent-adjusted EPA per play across 110 plays — a above-average rate for the WR.

2026 Usage Outlook · projected share of team plays

10%
projected
band 7%'25 13%14%

Regressed toward the WR mean. Model correlation r≈0.47 on a 2019-2025 walk-forward — volume only; efficiency not projected.

2025 Production

Rushing
123 Rush yards3 Rush TD26 Carries4.7 Yards/carry
Receiving
66 Receptions924 Rec yards5 Rec TD14.0 Yards/rec
Returns
17 Punt returns230 PR yards1 PR TD

Performance Analysis · 2025 · vs WR peers

EfficiencyVolumeExplosivenessConsistencyPass-Down
Player type
Versatile WR

Balanced profile without a single dominant trait — contributes across multiple dimensions.

Balanced usageMulti-role
Peer percentiles
Opponent-adjusted EPA (WEPA/play)88th %ile · above avg
Game-to-game consistency61th %ile · average
Key findings
  • Above-average efficiency for the WR position (88th percentile).
  • 6 high-impact games (EPA/play > 0.4) this season — elite ceiling.
  • Particularly dangerous on passing downs — efficiency spikes in obvious pass situations.
  • Peak game: 1.44 EPA/play in Wk 6 vs West Virginia (SP+ -7).

NIL Market Tier· 2025

On3 valuation ↗
Star

Top-10 nationally. Multiple mid-to-large collective deals expected.

Tier is a model estimate based on position, school brand, performance rank, and usage — not a reported deal. NIL deals are private. For a real market valuation, see On3's NIL profile, which factors in social following and actual deal tracking.

Historical Comparables · WR · efficiency + volume + value

Players from 2014–2024 matched on EPA efficiency, play volume, and adjusted value tier — not just one metric.

PlayerTeamYrPlaysWEPA/playLine valTotal EPA
Chris TyreeNotre Dame2020760.3100.623.6
Shai WertsGeorgia Southern20201280.3101.039.7
Zach AbeyNavy2016700.3700.825.9
Malik DunnerBall State2017760.2900.422.0
Eli HeidenreichNavy2024660.3400.722.4

Comps are statistical — efficiency, volume, and value tier all factor in. Style and conference context differ.

Game Log · box score + EPA, week by week

Wk 1 vs Portland State: +0.06 EPA/play1Wk 2 vs Stanford: -0.44 EPA/play2Wk 4 vs East Carolina: +0.20 EPA/play4Wk 5 vs Colorado: +0.24 EPA/play5Wk 6 vs West Virginia: +1.44 EPA/play6Wk 7 vs Arizona: +0.69 EPA/play7Wk 8 vs Utah: +0.61 EPA/play8Wk 11 vs Texas Tech: -0.25 EPA/play11Wk 12 vs TCU: +0.63 EPA/play12Wk 13 vs Cincinnati: +0.20 EPA/play13Wk 14 vs UCF: +0.98 EPA/play14Wk 15 vs Texas Tech: +0.51 EPA/play15Wk 1 vs Georgia Tech: +0.06 EPA/play1
EPA per play, by weekabove 0 = added points · below = lost
WkOpponentResultOpp SP+RecRec YdsAvgRec TDLongEPA/play
1vsPortland StateW69-0155.0050.06
2vsStanfordW27-3-11.8372.306-0.44
4@East CarolinaW34-138.055511.00190.20
5@ColoradoW24-21-8.35387.60150.24
6vsWest VirginiaW38-24-6.8411127.81541.44
7@ArizonaW33-2712.0511723.41750.69
8vsUtahW24-2122.245012.50170.61
9@Iowa StateW41-279.9713319.0245
11@Texas TechL7-2927.65438.6021-0.25
12vsTCUW44-138.358016.00300.63
13@CincinnatiW26-144.57395.60100.20
14vsUCFW41-21-1.2612621.01460.98
15vsTexas TechL7-3427.644411.00210.51
1vsGeorgia TechW25-219.357615.20280.06

Usage & Situational · Pro

Snap-share proxy
Overall
13.1%
Passing plays
24.4%
Rushing plays
4.7%
Standard downs
12.9%
Passing downs
13.5%
EPA by down type
Standard downs
0.28
Passing downs
0.55
Pass / Rush EPA
0.45 / -0.00

Usage = share of team plays (CFBD has no true snap counts).

EPA = expected points added (opponent-adjusted). NIL estimates are model-based ranges, not reported deals. Data: CollegeFootballData. Not betting advice.