Scores
Dev
← Player leaders
Peyton Lewis

#2Peyton Lewis

Peyton Lewis is a Explosive Back for Tennessee. Peyton's 2025 season ranks in the 0th percentile nationally by opponent-adjusted EPA per play across 72 plays — a developing rate for the RB.

2026 Usage Outlook · projected share of team plays

13%
projected
band 6%'25 11%20%

Regressed toward the RB mean. Model correlation r≈0.52 on a 2019-2025 walk-forward — volume only; efficiency not projected.

2025 Production

Rushing
290 Rush yards7 Rush TD70 Carries4.1 Yards/carry
Receiving
4 Receptions42 Rec yards0 Rec TD10.5 Yards/rec
Returns
6 Kick returns128 KR yards0 KR TD

Performance Analysis · 2025 · vs RB peers

EfficiencyVolumeExplosivenessConsistencyReceiving
Player type
Explosive Back

Elite per-carry efficiency — breaks big runs and creates chunk plays at a top rate while in a limited role.

Big-play threatHigh EPA per carryCapitalises on opportunities
Peer percentiles
Opponent-adjusted EPA (WEPA/play)0th %ile · below avg
Game-to-game consistency30th %ile · below avg
Key findings
  • Below-average efficiency vs RB peers — value comes through volume, not per-play impact.
  • High game-to-game variance — boom-or-bust profile.
  • 3 high-impact games (EPA/play > 0.4) this season — elite ceiling.
  • Peak game: 0.64 EPA/play in Wk 7 vs Arkansas (SP+ 5).

NIL Market Tier· 2025

On3 valuation ↗
Starter

Meaningful starter. Local collective + position-group deals.

Tier is a model estimate based on position, school brand, performance rank, and usage — not a reported deal. NIL deals are private. For a real market valuation, see On3's NIL profile, which factors in social following and actual deal tracking.

Game Log · box score + EPA, week by week

Wk 1 vs Syracuse: +0.57 EPA/play1Wk 2 vs East Tennessee State: +0.27 EPA/play2Wk 3 vs Georgia: -0.31 EPA/play3Wk 4 vs UAB: +0.59 EPA/play4Wk 5 vs Mississippi State: -0.31 EPA/play5Wk 7 vs Arkansas: +0.64 EPA/play7Wk 8 vs Alabama: -0.29 EPA/play8Wk 10 vs Oklahoma: +0.23 EPA/play10Wk 12 vs New Mexico State: +0.04 EPA/play12
EPA per play, by weekabove 0 = added points · below = lost
WkOpponentResultOpp SP+CarRush YdsAvgRush TDRecRec YdsRec TDEPA/play
1vsSyracuseW45-26-13.18384.810.57
2vsEast Tennessee StateW72-178192.411900.27
3vsGeorgiaL41-4424.15193.80-0.31
4vsUABW56-24-15.811817.410.59
5@Mississippi StateW41-344.13103.30-0.31
7vsArkansasW34-315.18334.120.64
8@AlabamaL20-3714.86183.001150-0.29
9@KentuckyW56-341.8492.31
10vsOklahomaL27-3318.37213.0021800.23
12vsNew Mexico StateW42-9-15.510424.210.04

Usage & Situational · Pro

Snap-share proxy
Overall
11.1%
Passing plays
2.4%
Rushing plays
20.1%
Standard downs
12.3%
Passing downs
7.8%
EPA by down type
Standard downs
0.25
Passing downs
0.08
Pass / Rush EPA
0.15 / 0.23

Usage = share of team plays (CFBD has no true snap counts).

EPA = expected points added (opponent-adjusted). NIL estimates are model-based ranges, not reported deals. Data: CollegeFootballData. Not betting advice.