Scores
Dev
← Player leaders
Randy Pittman

Randy Pittman

Randy Pittman is a Slot Specialist TE for Florida State. Randy's 2025 season produced 24.4 total EPA across 41 plays.

2026 Usage Outlook · projected share of team plays

5%
projected
band 3%'25 7%7%

Regressed toward the TE mean. Model correlation r≈0.42 on a 2019-2025 walk-forward — volume only; efficiency not projected.

2025 Production

Receiving
23 Receptions208 Rec yards2 Rec TD9.0 Yards/rec

Performance Analysis · 2025 · vs TE peers

EfficiencyVolumeExplosivenessConsistencyPass-Down
Player type
Slot Specialist TE

The offense's primary passing-down weapon — routes, separation, and reliability on 3rd down define this role.

3rd-down converterRoute technicianHigh passing-down share
Peer percentiles
Opponent-adjusted EPA (WEPA/play)100th %ile · elite
Game-to-game consistency82th %ile · above avg
Key findings
  • Top-10% efficiency among TEs — elite opponent-adjusted EPA rate.
  • Limited usage share suggests a rotational or specialist role.
  • High game-to-game consistency — reliable floor each week.
  • 6 high-impact games (EPA/play > 0.4) this season — elite ceiling.
  • Particularly dangerous on passing downs — efficiency spikes in obvious pass situations.
  • Peak game: 1.66 EPA/play in Wk 10 vs Wake Forest (SP+ 6).

NIL Market Tier· 2025

On3 valuation ↗
Elite

Top-3 player at position nationally. Collective + national brand deals.

Tier is a model estimate based on position, school brand, performance rank, and usage — not a reported deal. NIL deals are private. For a real market valuation, see On3's NIL profile, which factors in social following and actual deal tracking.

Historical Comparables · TE · efficiency + volume + value

Players from 2014–2024 matched on EPA efficiency, play volume, and adjusted value tier — not just one metric.

PlayerTeamYrPlaysWEPA/playLine valTotal EPA
Ty ThompsonTulane2024480.4200.420.2
Seth GreenMinnesota2018830.3900.032.4
Johnny LanganRutgers2020590.3000.017.7
Evan SvobodaWyoming2024750.2900.021.8
Jordan MyersRice2021590.2700.215.9

Comps are statistical — efficiency, volume, and value tier all factor in. Style and conference context differ.

Game Log · box score + EPA, week by week

Wk 1 vs Alabama: +1.26 EPA/play1Wk 5 vs Virginia: +1.26 EPA/play5Wk 6 vs Miami: +0.19 EPA/play6Wk 8 vs Stanford: +0.26 EPA/play8Wk 10 vs Wake Forest: +1.66 EPA/play10Wk 11 vs Clemson: +1.04 EPA/play11Wk 12 vs Virginia Tech: +0.27 EPA/play12Wk 13 vs NC State: +0.60 EPA/play13Wk 14 vs Florida: +0.94 EPA/play14
EPA per play, by weekabove 0 = added points · below = lost
WkOpponentResultOpp SP+RecRec YdsAvgRec TDLongEPA/play
1vsAlabamaW31-1714.82189.00141.26
5@VirginiaL38-4611.12168.01111.26
6vsMiamiL22-2820.77395.61150.19
8@StanfordL13-20-11.83248.00120.26
10vsWake ForestW42-75.723216.00301.66
11@ClemsonL10-249.524723.50351.04
12vsVirginia TechW34-14-10.1177.0070.27
13@NC StateL11-214.82115.5060.60
14@FloridaL21-403.52147.0090.94

Usage & Situational · Pro

Snap-share proxy
Overall
6.5%
Passing plays
12.8%
Rushing plays
1.5%
Standard downs
4.7%
Passing downs
10.2%
EPA by down type
Standard downs
0.36
Passing downs
0.82
Pass / Rush EPA
0.55 / 0.90

Usage = share of team plays (CFBD has no true snap counts).

EPA = expected points added (opponent-adjusted). NIL estimates are model-based ranges, not reported deals. Data: CollegeFootballData. Not betting advice.