Scores
Dev
← Player leaders
Riley Nowakowski

#37Riley Nowakowski

Riley Nowakowski is a Versatile TE for Indiana. Riley's 2025 season produced 22.2 total EPA across 32 plays.

2026 Usage Outlook · projected share of team plays

4%
projected
band 2%'25 4%6%

Regressed toward the TE mean. Model correlation r≈0.42 on a 2019-2025 walk-forward — volume only; efficiency not projected.

2025 Production

Receiving
32 Receptions387 Rec yards2 Rec TD12.1 Yards/rec

Performance Analysis · 2025 · vs TE peers

EfficiencyVolumeExplosivenessConsistencyPass-Down
Player type
Versatile TE

Balanced profile without a single dominant trait — contributes across multiple dimensions.

Balanced usageMulti-role
Peer percentiles
Opponent-adjusted EPA (WEPA/play)100th %ile · elite
Game-to-game consistency55th %ile · average
Key findings
  • Top-10% efficiency among TEs — elite opponent-adjusted EPA rate.
  • Limited usage share suggests a rotational or specialist role.
  • 9 high-impact games (EPA/play > 0.4) this season — elite ceiling.
  • Particularly dangerous on passing downs — efficiency spikes in obvious pass situations.
  • Production faded as the season progressed — 0.20 EPA/play decline from first to second half.
  • Peak game: 3.94 EPA/play in Wk 4 vs Illinois (SP+ 13).

NIL Market Tier· 2025

On3 valuation ↗
Elite

Top-3 player at position nationally. Collective + national brand deals.

Tier is a model estimate based on position, school brand, performance rank, and usage — not a reported deal. NIL deals are private. For a real market valuation, see On3's NIL profile, which factors in social following and actual deal tracking.

Historical Comparables · TE · efficiency + volume + value

Players from 2014–2024 matched on EPA efficiency, play volume, and adjusted value tier — not just one metric.

PlayerTeamYrPlaysWEPA/playLine valTotal EPA
Ty ThompsonTulane2024480.4200.420.2
Seth GreenMinnesota2018830.3900.032.4
Johnny LanganRutgers2020590.3000.017.7
Evan SvobodaWyoming2024750.2900.021.8
Jordan MyersRice2021590.2700.215.9

Comps are statistical — efficiency, volume, and value tier all factor in. Style and conference context differ.

Game Log · box score + EPA, week by week

Wk 1 vs Old Dominion: -0.95 EPA/play1Wk 2 vs Kennesaw State: +1.35 EPA/play2Wk 4 vs Illinois: +3.94 EPA/play4Wk 5 vs Iowa: -0.17 EPA/play5Wk 7 vs Oregon: +0.19 EPA/play7Wk 8 vs Michigan State: +0.94 EPA/play8Wk 10 vs Maryland: -0.66 EPA/play10Wk 11 vs Penn State: +1.14 EPA/play11Wk 12 vs Wisconsin: +0.63 EPA/play12Wk 15 vs Ohio State: +1.55 EPA/play15Wk 1 vs Oregon: +0.71 EPA/play1Wk 1 vs Alabama: +0.71 EPA/play1Wk 1 vs Miami: +0.71 EPA/play1
EPA per play, by weekabove 0 = added points · below = lost
WkOpponentResultOpp SP+RecRec YdsAvgRec TDLongEPA/play
1vsOld DominionW27-145.92157.509-0.95
2vsKennesaw StateW56-9-5.411414.00141.35
4vsIllinoisW63-1012.914343.01433.94
5@IowaW20-1519.7144.004-0.17
7@OregonW30-2025.93113.7060.19
8vsMichigan StateW38-13-3.435418.00390.94
9vsUCLAW56-6-8.73175.706
10@MarylandW55-100.622211.0019-0.66
11@Penn StateW27-2418.135117.00291.14
12vsWisconsinW31-7-4.446516.31370.63
15vsOhio StateW13-1030.122010.00111.55
1vsOregonW56-2225.92189.00130.71
1vsAlabamaW38-314.833612.00310.71
1vsMiamiW27-2120.72178.5090.71

Usage & Situational · Pro

Snap-share proxy
Overall
3.9%
Passing plays
9.4%
Rushing plays
0.2%
Standard downs
3.5%
Passing downs
5.0%
EPA by down type
Standard downs
0.47
Passing downs
1.19
Pass / Rush EPA
0.64 / 2.45

Usage = share of team plays (CFBD has no true snap counts).

EPA = expected points added (opponent-adjusted). NIL estimates are model-based ranges, not reported deals. Data: CollegeFootballData. Not betting advice.