Scores
Dev
← Player leaders
Tawee Walker

#3Tawee Walker

Tawee Walker is a Explosive Back for Cincinnati. Tawee's 2025 season ranks in the 0th percentile nationally by opponent-adjusted EPA per play across 112 plays — a developing rate for the RB.

2026 Usage Outlook · projected share of team plays

17%
projected
band 10%'25 18%24%

Regressed toward the RB mean. Model correlation r≈0.52 on a 2019-2025 walk-forward — volume only; efficiency not projected.

2025 Production

Rushing
709 Rush yards4 Rush TD120 Carries5.9 Yards/carry
Receiving
18 Receptions78 Rec yards1 Rec TD4.3 Yards/rec

Performance Analysis · 2025 · vs RB peers

EfficiencyVolumeExplosivenessConsistencyReceiving
Player type
Explosive Back

Elite per-carry efficiency — breaks big runs and creates chunk plays at a top rate while in a limited role.

Big-play threatHigh EPA per carryCapitalises on opportunities
Peer percentiles
Opponent-adjusted EPA (WEPA/play)0th %ile · below avg
Game-to-game consistency48th %ile · average
Key findings
  • Below-average efficiency vs RB peers — value comes through volume, not per-play impact.
  • 3 high-impact games (EPA/play > 0.4) this season — elite ceiling.
  • Particularly dangerous on passing downs — efficiency spikes in obvious pass situations.
  • Strong second-half surge — EPA/play improved 0.28 from the first to second half of the season.
  • Peak game: 1.69 EPA/play in Wk 10 vs Utah (SP+ 22).

NIL Market Tier· 2025

On3 valuation ↗
Starter

Meaningful starter. Local collective + position-group deals.

Tier is a model estimate based on position, school brand, performance rank, and usage — not a reported deal. NIL deals are private. For a real market valuation, see On3's NIL profile, which factors in social following and actual deal tracking.

Game Log · box score + EPA, week by week

Wk 1 vs Nebraska: +0.51 EPA/play1Wk 2 vs Bowling Green: -0.12 EPA/play2Wk 3 vs Northwestern State: +0.65 EPA/play3Wk 5 vs Kansas: +0.01 EPA/play5Wk 6 vs Iowa State: +0.21 EPA/play6Wk 7 vs UCF: -0.24 EPA/play7Wk 8 vs Oklahoma State: +0.38 EPA/play8Wk 10 vs Utah: +1.69 EPA/play10Wk 12 vs Arizona: +0.11 EPA/play12Wk 13 vs BYU: -0.15 EPA/play13Wk 14 vs TCU: +0.25 EPA/play14
EPA per play, by weekabove 0 = added points · below = lost
WkOpponentResultOpp SP+CarRush YdsAvgRush TDRecRec YdsRec TDEPA/play
1vsNebraskaL17-206.27537.601-400.51
2vsBowling GreenW34-20-12.611322.901-20-0.12
3vsNorthwestern StateW70-066611.0122310.65
5@KansasW37-344.118734.121400.01
6vsIowa StateW38-309.914896.400.21
7vsUCFW20-11-1.28313.90150-0.24
8@Oklahoma StateW49-17-15.17385.400.38
9vsBaylorW41-201.419844.413180
10@UtahL14-4522.27679.601.69
12vsArizonaL24-3012.0121199.902000.11
13vsBYUL14-2615.9591.804220-0.15
14@TCUL23-458.36488.0031200.25

Usage & Situational · Pro

Snap-share proxy
Overall
18.0%
Passing plays
5.2%
Rushing plays
32.4%
Standard downs
21.0%
Passing downs
10.9%
EPA by down type
Standard downs
0.16
Passing downs
0.45
Pass / Rush EPA
0.20 / 0.21

Usage = share of team plays (CFBD has no true snap counts).

EPA = expected points added (opponent-adjusted). NIL estimates are model-based ranges, not reported deals. Data: CollegeFootballData. Not betting advice.