Scores
Dev
← Player leaders
Terik Mulder

#89Terik Mulder

Terik Mulder is a Red Zone Weapon TE for Kent State.

2026 Usage Outlook · projected share of team plays

4%
projected
band 2%'25 5%6%

Regressed toward the TE mean. Model correlation r≈0.42 on a 2019-2025 walk-forward — volume only; efficiency not projected.

2025 Production

Receiving
19 Receptions198 Rec yards4 Rec TD10.4 Yards/rec

Performance Analysis · 2025 · vs TE peers

EfficiencyVolumeExplosivenessConsistencyPass-Down
Player type
Red Zone Weapon TE

Goes from good to great inside the 20 — high TD conversion on limited looks makes this receiver a scoring machine.

Red zone targetHigh TD rateSize/catch radius advantage
Peer percentiles
Opponent-adjusted EPA (WEPA/play)100th %ile · elite
Game-to-game consistency67th %ile · average
Key findings
  • Top-10% efficiency among TEs — elite opponent-adjusted EPA rate.
  • Limited usage share suggests a rotational or specialist role.
  • 4 high-impact games (EPA/play > 0.4) this season — elite ceiling.
  • Strong second-half surge — EPA/play improved 0.33 from the first to second half of the season.
  • Peak game: 2.00 EPA/play in Wk 3 vs Buffalo (SP+ -8).

NIL Market Tier· 2025

On3 valuation ↗
Elite

Top-3 player at position nationally. Collective + national brand deals.

Tier is a model estimate based on position, school brand, performance rank, and usage — not a reported deal. NIL deals are private. For a real market valuation, see On3's NIL profile, which factors in social following and actual deal tracking.

Historical Comparables · TE · efficiency + volume + value

Players from 2014–2024 matched on EPA efficiency, play volume, and adjusted value tier — not just one metric.

PlayerTeamYrPlaysWEPA/playLine valTotal EPA
Ty ThompsonTulane2024480.4200.420.2
Seth GreenMinnesota2018830.3900.032.4

Comps are statistical — efficiency, volume, and value tier all factor in. Style and conference context differ.

Game Log · box score + EPA, week by week

Wk 1 vs Merrimack: +0.17 EPA/play1Wk 2 vs Texas Tech: -0.15 EPA/play2Wk 3 vs Buffalo: +2.00 EPA/play3Wk 4 vs Florida State: -0.01 EPA/play4Wk 7 vs Massachusetts: +1.83 EPA/play7Wk 8 vs Toledo: +0.67 EPA/play8Wk 12 vs Akron: +1.84 EPA/play12Wk 13 vs Central Michigan: +0.00 EPA/play13
EPA per play, by weekabove 0 = added points · below = lost
WkOpponentResultOpp SP+RecRec YdsAvgRec TDLongEPA/play
1vsMerrimackW21-172178.50170.17
2@Texas TechL14-6227.62178.5018-0.15
3vsBuffaloL28-31-7.535518.31502.00
4@Florida StateL10-667.2111.001-0.01
7vsMassachusettsW42-6-36.611010.01101.83
8@ToledoL10-456.011717.00170.67
12@AkronW42-35-13.944611.51231.84
13vsCentral MichiganL16-28-8.84307.50220.00
14@Northern IllinoisW35-31-16.7155.015

Usage & Situational · Pro

Snap-share proxy
Overall
5.0%
Passing plays
10.8%
Rushing plays
0.0%
Standard downs
4.3%
Passing downs
6.1%
EPA by down type
Standard downs
1.08
Passing downs
0.43
Pass / Rush EPA
0.82 / —

Usage = share of team plays (CFBD has no true snap counts).

EPA = expected points added (opponent-adjusted). NIL estimates are model-based ranges, not reported deals. Data: CollegeFootballData. Not betting advice.