Scores
Dev
← Player leaders
Titus Davis

#84Titus Davis

Titus Davis is a Red Zone Weapon WR for Central Michigan. Titus's 2014 season ranks in the 100th percentile nationally by opponent-adjusted EPA per play across 94 plays — a elite rate for the WR.

2014 Production

Receiving
60 Receptions980 Rec yards13 Rec TD16.3 Yards/rec
Returns
3 Punt returns67 PR yards0 PR TD

Performance Analysis · 2014 · vs WR peers

EfficiencyVolumeExplosivenessConsistencyPass-Down
Player type
Red Zone Weapon WR

Goes from good to great inside the 20 — high TD conversion on limited looks makes this receiver a scoring machine.

Red zone targetHigh TD rateSize/catch radius advantage
Peer percentiles
Opponent-adjusted EPA (WEPA/play)100th %ile · elite
Game-to-game consistency77th %ile · above avg
Key findings
  • Top-10% efficiency among WRs — elite opponent-adjusted EPA rate.
  • High game-to-game consistency — reliable floor each week.
  • 8 high-impact games (EPA/play > 0.4) this season — elite ceiling.
  • Particularly dangerous on passing downs — efficiency spikes in obvious pass situations.
  • Strong second-half surge — EPA/play improved 0.23 from the first to second half of the season.
  • Peak game: 1.62 EPA/play in Wk 12 vs Miami (OH) (SP+ -19).

Historical Comparables · WR · efficiency + volume + value

Players from 2014–2024 matched on EPA efficiency, play volume, and adjusted value tier — not just one metric.

PlayerTeamYrPlaysWEPA/playLine valTotal EPA
Quadree HendersonPittsburgh2016630.5301.633.4
DeAndre HughesAir Force2021600.4701.328.2
Keytaon ThompsonMississippi State2017700.4601.232.2
Savion WilliamsTCU2024560.4501.125.2
Javion PoseyFlorida Atlantic2020530.4501.423.8

Comps are statistical — efficiency, volume, and value tier all factor in. Style and conference context differ.

Game Log · box score + EPA, week by week

Wk 1 vs Chattanooga: -0.11 EPA/play1Wk 5 vs Toledo: +1.18 EPA/play5Wk 6 vs Ohio: +1.31 EPA/play6Wk 7 vs Northern Illinois: -0.15 EPA/play7Wk 8 vs Ball State: +0.71 EPA/play8Wk 9 vs Buffalo: +0.87 EPA/play9Wk 10 vs Eastern Michigan: +0.71 EPA/play10Wk 12 vs Miami (OH): +1.62 EPA/play12Wk 13 vs Western Michigan: +0.50 EPA/play13Wk 1 vs Western Kentucky: +0.41 EPA/play1
EPA per play, by weekabove 0 = added points · below = lost
WkOpponentResultOpp SP+RecRec YdsAvgRec TDLongEPA/play
1vsChattanoogaW20-1611111.0011-0.11
5@ToledoL28-422.3612821.30401.18
6vsOhioW28-10-11.71018118.12531.31
7@Northern IllinoisW34-17-0.645413.5029-0.15
8vsBall StateL29-32-6.61012812.82310.71
9@BuffaloW20-14-7.7610016.71280.87
10@Eastern MichiganW38-7-25.945112.81160.71
12vsMiami (OH)W34-27-18.7810212.83281.62
13vsWestern MichiganL20-32-0.858817.60270.50
1vsWestern KentuckyL48-49-2.6613722.84450.41

Usage & Situational · Pro

Snap-share proxy
Overall
13.9%
Passing plays
30.3%
Rushing plays
0.8%
Standard downs
10.0%
Passing downs
24.0%
EPA by down type
Standard downs
0.52
Passing downs
1.19
Pass / Rush EPA
0.85 / 0.32

Usage = share of team plays (CFBD has no true snap counts).

EPA = expected points added (opponent-adjusted). NIL estimates are model-based ranges, not reported deals. Data: CollegeFootballData. Not betting advice.