Scores
Dev
← Player leaders
Tre Williams III

#6Tre Williams III

Tre Williams III is a Slot Specialist TE for North Texas. Tre's 2025 season produced 15.1 total EPA across 34 plays.

2026 Usage Outlook · projected share of team plays

4%
projected
band 2%'25 4%6%

Regressed toward the TE mean. Model correlation r≈0.42 on a 2019-2025 walk-forward — volume only; efficiency not projected.

2025 Production

Receiving
30 Receptions375 Rec yards5 Rec TD12.5 Yards/rec

Performance Analysis · 2025 · vs TE peers

EfficiencyVolumeExplosivenessConsistencyPass-Down
Player type
Slot Specialist TE

The offense's primary passing-down weapon — routes, separation, and reliability on 3rd down define this role.

3rd-down converterRoute technicianHigh passing-down share
Peer percentiles
Opponent-adjusted EPA (WEPA/play)100th %ile · elite
Game-to-game consistency61th %ile · average
Key findings
  • Top-10% efficiency among TEs — elite opponent-adjusted EPA rate.
  • Limited usage share suggests a rotational or specialist role.
  • 8 high-impact games (EPA/play > 0.4) this season — elite ceiling.
  • Peak game: 2.58 EPA/play in Wk 5 vs South Alabama (SP+ -13).

NIL Market Tier· 2025

On3 valuation ↗
Star

Top-10 nationally. Multiple mid-to-large collective deals expected.

Tier is a model estimate based on position, school brand, performance rank, and usage — not a reported deal. NIL deals are private. For a real market valuation, see On3's NIL profile, which factors in social following and actual deal tracking.

Historical Comparables · TE · efficiency + volume + value

Players from 2014–2024 matched on EPA efficiency, play volume, and adjusted value tier — not just one metric.

PlayerTeamYrPlaysWEPA/playLine valTotal EPA
Ty ThompsonTulane2024480.4200.420.2
Seth GreenMinnesota2018830.3900.032.4
Johnny LanganRutgers2020590.3000.017.7
Evan SvobodaWyoming2024750.2900.021.8
Jordan MyersRice2021590.2700.215.9

Comps are statistical — efficiency, volume, and value tier all factor in. Style and conference context differ.

Game Log · box score + EPA, week by week

Wk 1 vs Lamar: -0.70 EPA/play1Wk 2 vs Western Michigan: +0.83 EPA/play2Wk 3 vs Washington State: +2.52 EPA/play3Wk 4 vs Army: +0.82 EPA/play4Wk 5 vs South Alabama: +2.58 EPA/play5Wk 7 vs South Florida: -0.27 EPA/play7Wk 8 vs UTSA: -0.20 EPA/play8Wk 10 vs Navy: +0.81 EPA/play10Wk 12 vs UAB: +1.57 EPA/play12Wk 13 vs Rice: +2.15 EPA/play13Wk 14 vs Temple: +0.18 EPA/play14Wk 15 vs Tulane: +0.77 EPA/play15Wk 1 vs San Diego State: -0.38 EPA/play1
EPA per play, by weekabove 0 = added points · below = lost
WkOpponentResultOpp SP+RecRec YdsAvgRec TDLongEPA/play
1vsLamarW51-02115.507-0.70
2@Western MichiganW33-30-1.422110.51180.83
3vsWashington StateW59-103.822613.01202.52
4@ArmyW45-380.822010.00180.82
5vsSouth AlabamaW36-22-12.712727.00272.58
7vsSouth FloridaL36-6311.62157.5110-0.27
8vsUTSAW55-173.72189.0012-0.20
9@CharlotteW54-20-26.756012.0030
10vsNavyW31-176.233511.70260.81
12@UABW53-24-15.811818.00181.57
13@RiceW56-24-14.826231.01562.15
14vsTempleW52-25-5.1166.0060.18
15@TulaneL21-346.345213.01220.77
1vsSan Diego StateW49-476.7144.004-0.38

Usage & Situational · Pro

Snap-share proxy
Overall
3.8%
Passing plays
8.1%
Rushing plays
0.0%
Standard downs
3.3%
Passing downs
5.4%
EPA by down type
Standard downs
0.41
Passing downs
0.50
Pass / Rush EPA
0.44 / —

Usage = share of team plays (CFBD has no true snap counts).

EPA = expected points added (opponent-adjusted). NIL estimates are model-based ranges, not reported deals. Data: CollegeFootballData. Not betting advice.