Scores
Dev
← Player leaders
Trinidad Chambliss

#6Trinidad Chambliss

Trinidad Chambliss is a Dual-Threat QB for Ole Miss. Trinidad's 2025 season ranks in the 0th percentile nationally by opponent-adjusted EPA per play across 545 plays — a developing rate for the QB.

2026 Usage Outlook · projected share of team plays

44%
projected
band 26%'25 51%62%

Regressed toward the QB mean. Model correlation r≈0.46 on a 2019-2025 walk-forward — volume only; efficiency not projected.

2025 Production

Passing
294/445 Comp/Att3937 Pass yards22 Pass TD3 INT66.1% Comp %
Rushing
527 Rush yards8 Rush TD133 Carries4.0 Yards/carry

Performance Analysis · 2025 · vs QB peers

EfficiencyVolumeDual-ThreatConsistencyClutch
Player type
Dual-Threat QB

A genuine rushing threat who stresses defenses horizontally. Extends plays with legs and forces extra gap assignments.

Rushing threatScrambles for valueStresses defensive structure
Peer percentiles
Opponent-adjusted EPA (WEPA/play)0th %ile · below avg
Game-to-game consistency74th %ile · average
Key findings
  • Below-average efficiency vs QB peers — value comes through volume, not per-play impact.
  • High-volume role — one of the team's most-used QBs by play share.
  • High game-to-game consistency — reliable floor each week.
  • 5 high-impact games (EPA/play > 0.4) this season — elite ceiling.
  • Particularly dangerous on passing downs — efficiency spikes in obvious pass situations.
  • Production faded as the season progressed — 0.18 EPA/play decline from first to second half.
  • Peak game: 0.59 EPA/play in Wk 3 vs Arkansas (SP+ 5).

NIL Market Tier· 2025

On3 valuation ↗
Star

Top-10 nationally. Multiple mid-to-large collective deals expected.

Tier is a model estimate based on position, school brand, performance rank, and usage — not a reported deal. NIL deals are private. For a real market valuation, see On3's NIL profile, which factors in social following and actual deal tracking.

Game Log · box score + EPA, week by week

Wk 1 vs Georgia State: +0.40 EPA/play1Wk 2 vs Kentucky: -0.30 EPA/play2Wk 3 vs Arkansas: +0.59 EPA/play3Wk 4 vs Tulane: +0.55 EPA/play4Wk 5 vs LSU: +0.54 EPA/play5Wk 7 vs Washington State: +0.21 EPA/play7Wk 8 vs Georgia: +0.49 EPA/play8Wk 9 vs Oklahoma: +0.34 EPA/play9Wk 10 vs South Carolina: +0.05 EPA/play10Wk 11 vs The Citadel: +0.43 EPA/play11Wk 12 vs Florida: +0.12 EPA/play12Wk 14 vs Mississippi State: +0.20 EPA/play14Wk 1 vs Georgia: +0.13 EPA/play1Wk 1 vs Miami: +0.13 EPA/play1Wk 1 vs Tulane: +0.13 EPA/play1
EPA per play, by weekabove 0 = added points · below = lost
WkOpponentResultOpp SP+C/ATTPass YdsPass TDINTQBRRush YdsRush TDEPA/play
1vsGeorgia StateW63-7-24.54/6591072.3800.40
2@KentuckyW30-231.8130-0.30
3vsArkansasW41-355.121/293531089.56220.59
4vsTulaneW45-106.317/273072090.111200.55
5vsLSUW24-1910.323/393141186.97100.54
7vsWashington StateW24-213.820/292532060.61510.21
8@GeorgiaL35-4324.119/362631088.44220.49
9@OklahomaW34-2618.324/443151090.75300.34
10vsSouth CarolinaW30-145.912/211591170.75910.05
11vsThe CitadelW49-029/333333078.0-100.43
12vsFloridaW34-243.526/353011172.91000.12
14@Mississippi StateW38-194.123/343594093.42600.20
1vsGeorgiaW39-3424.130/463622090.61400.13
1vsMiamiL27-3120.723/372771083.6700.13
1vsTulaneW41-106.323/292821093.33620.13

Usage & Situational · Pro

Snap-share proxy
Overall
50.9%
Passing plays
83.4%
Rushing plays
20.7%
Standard downs
45.4%
Passing downs
65.8%
EPA by down type
Standard downs
0.22
Passing downs
0.56
Pass / Rush EPA
0.36 / 0.24

Usage = share of team plays (CFBD has no true snap counts).

EPA = expected points added (opponent-adjusted). NIL estimates are model-based ranges, not reported deals. Data: CollegeFootballData. Not betting advice.