Scores
Dev
← Player leaders
Will Rogers

#7Will Rogers

Will Rogers is a 2-year Clutch Passer for Washington. Will's 2024 season ranks in the 0th percentile nationally by opponent-adjusted EPA per play across 326 plays — a developing rate for the QB.

2024 Production

Passing
220/311 Comp/Att2458 Pass yards14 Pass TD7 INT70.7% Comp %
Rushing
-79 Rush yards0 Rush TD34 Carries-2.3 Yards/carry

Performance Analysis · 2024 · vs QB peers

EfficiencyVolumeDual-ThreatConsistencyClutch
Player type
Clutch Passer

Elevates on passing downs — 3rd-and-medium, two-minute drills, and pressure situations are where this QB is best.

3rd-down precisionLate-game valueHigh passing-down EPA
Peer percentiles
Opponent-adjusted EPA (WEPA/play)0th %ile · below avg
Game-to-game consistency76th %ile · above avg
Key findings
  • Below-average efficiency vs QB peers — value comes through volume, not per-play impact.
  • High-volume role — one of the team's most-used QBs by play share.
  • High game-to-game consistency — reliable floor each week.
  • 4 high-impact games (EPA/play > 0.4) this season — elite ceiling.
  • Particularly dangerous on passing downs — efficiency spikes in obvious pass situations.
  • Production faded as the season progressed — 0.38 EPA/play decline from first to second half.
  • Peak game: 0.80 EPA/play in Wk 2 vs Eastern Michigan (SP+ -13).

NIL Market Tier· 2024

On3 valuation ↗
Star

Top-10 nationally. Multiple mid-to-large collective deals expected.

Tier is a model estimate based on position, school brand, performance rank, and usage — not a reported deal. NIL deals are private. For a real market valuation, see On3's NIL profile, which factors in social following and actual deal tracking.

Game Log · box score + EPA, week by week

Wk 1 vs Weber State: +0.25 EPA/play1Wk 2 vs Eastern Michigan: +0.80 EPA/play2Wk 3 vs Washington State: +0.57 EPA/play3Wk 4 vs Northwestern: +0.50 EPA/play4Wk 5 vs Rutgers: +0.40 EPA/play5Wk 6 vs Michigan: +0.56 EPA/play6Wk 7 vs Iowa: +0.08 EPA/play7Wk 9 vs Indiana: +0.18 EPA/play9Wk 10 vs USC: +0.17 EPA/play10Wk 11 vs Penn State: -0.21 EPA/play11Wk 12 vs UCLA: +0.38 EPA/play12
EPA per play, by weekabove 0 = added points · below = lost
WkOpponentResultOpp SP+C/ATTPass YdsPass TDINTQBRRush YdsRush TDEPA/play
1vsWeber StateW35-320/262501035.8-1600.25
2vsEastern MichiganW30-9-13.321/262614092.4-700.80
3vsWashington StateL19-241.323/313141066.6-1100.57
4vsNorthwesternW24-5-8.220/282232070.41700.50
5@RutgersL18-216.426/363062052.7500.40
6vsMichiganW27-1710.621/312712185.0-1900.56
7@IowaL16-4015.822/341951159.4-1500.08
9@IndianaL17-3120.119/262020214.6-2100.18
10vsUSCW26-2111.925/392620064.70.17
11@Penn StateL6-3524.610/13590149.8-120-0.21
12vsUCLAW31-19-1.313/211151233.10.38

Usage & Situational · Pro

Snap-share proxy
Overall
46.4%
Passing plays
82.3%
Rushing plays
4.6%
Standard downs
40.4%
Passing downs
63.4%
EPA by down type
Standard downs
0.30
Passing downs
0.45
Pass / Rush EPA
0.38 / -0.24

Usage = share of team plays (CFBD has no true snap counts).

Career · rolling EPA, game by game

Per-game EPA5-game avg
2022
2021 — 2022 · 26 games
SeasonTeamLine valueWEPA/playYoY ΔTotal EPA
2021Mississippi State
8.5
0.460318.8
2022Mississippi State
7.2
0.420-0.04260.0

Chart shows per-game EPA (bars) and rolling 5-game average (line). Season breaks marked with dashed lines. Line value = est. points over replacement per game.

EPA = expected points added (opponent-adjusted). NIL estimates are model-based ranges, not reported deals. Data: CollegeFootballData. Not betting advice.