Scores
Dev
← Player leaders
Willie Rodriguez

#81Willie Rodriguez

Willie Rodriguez is a Versatile TE for Kentucky.

2026 Usage Outlook · projected share of team plays

4%
projected
band 2%'25 5%6%

Regressed toward the TE mean. Model correlation r≈0.42 on a 2019-2025 walk-forward — volume only; efficiency not projected.

2025 Production

Receiving
23 Receptions310 Rec yards1 Rec TD13.5 Yards/rec

Performance Analysis · 2025 · vs TE peers

EfficiencyVolumeExplosivenessConsistencyPass-Down
Player type
Versatile TE

Balanced profile without a single dominant trait — contributes across multiple dimensions.

Balanced usageMulti-role
Peer percentiles
Opponent-adjusted EPA (WEPA/play)100th %ile · elite
Game-to-game consistency59th %ile · average
Key findings
  • Top-10% efficiency among TEs — elite opponent-adjusted EPA rate.
  • Limited usage share suggests a rotational or specialist role.
  • 5 high-impact games (EPA/play > 0.4) this season — elite ceiling.
  • Particularly dangerous on passing downs — efficiency spikes in obvious pass situations.
  • Strong second-half surge — EPA/play improved 0.08 from the first to second half of the season.
  • Peak game: 1.82 EPA/play in Wk 3 vs Eastern Michigan (SP+ -15).

NIL Market Tier· 2025

On3 valuation ↗
Elite

Top-3 player at position nationally. Collective + national brand deals.

Tier is a model estimate based on position, school brand, performance rank, and usage — not a reported deal. NIL deals are private. For a real market valuation, see On3's NIL profile, which factors in social following and actual deal tracking.

Historical Comparables · TE · efficiency + volume + value

Players from 2014–2024 matched on EPA efficiency, play volume, and adjusted value tier — not just one metric.

PlayerTeamYrPlaysWEPA/playLine valTotal EPA
Ty ThompsonTulane2024480.4200.420.2
Seth GreenMinnesota2018830.3900.032.4
Johnny LanganRutgers2020590.3000.017.7
Evan SvobodaWyoming2024750.2900.021.8
Jordan MyersRice2021590.2700.215.9

Comps are statistical — efficiency, volume, and value tier all factor in. Style and conference context differ.

Game Log · box score + EPA, week by week

Wk 1 vs Toledo: -0.44 EPA/play1Wk 2 vs Ole Miss: +0.44 EPA/play2Wk 3 vs Eastern Michigan: +1.82 EPA/play3Wk 5 vs South Carolina: +1.54 EPA/play5Wk 6 vs Georgia: -0.23 EPA/play6Wk 8 vs Texas: +0.11 EPA/play8Wk 10 vs Auburn: -0.16 EPA/play10Wk 11 vs Florida: +1.79 EPA/play11Wk 13 vs Vanderbilt: +1.11 EPA/play13Wk 14 vs Louisville: +0.08 EPA/play14
EPA per play, by weekabove 0 = added points · below = lost
WkOpponentResultOpp SP+RecRec YdsAvgRec TDLongEPA/play
1vsToledoW24-166.023115.5023-0.44
2vsOle MissL23-3024.0199.0090.44
3vsEastern MichiganW48-23-14.722814.01251.82
5@South CarolinaL13-355.926633.00531.54
6@GeorgiaL14-3524.1273.505-0.23
8vsTexasL13-1616.233210.70190.11
9vsTennesseeL34-5615.022814.0018
10@AuburnW10-311.6188.008-0.16
11vsFloridaW38-73.5188.0081.79
13@VanderbiltL17-4520.367813.00201.11
14@LouisvilleL0-4112.411515.00150.08

Usage & Situational · Pro

Snap-share proxy
Overall
4.8%
Passing plays
10.0%
Rushing plays
0.0%
Standard downs
4.2%
Passing downs
6.1%
EPA by down type
Standard downs
0.47
Passing downs
0.62
Pass / Rush EPA
0.53 / —

Usage = share of team plays (CFBD has no true snap counts).

EPA = expected points added (opponent-adjusted). NIL estimates are model-based ranges, not reported deals. Data: CollegeFootballData. Not betting advice.