Scores
Dev
← Player leaders
Eli Raridon

#9Eli Raridon

Eli Raridon is a Versatile TE for Notre Dame. Eli's 2025 season produced 23.9 total EPA across 40 plays.

2026 Usage Outlook · projected share of team plays

5%
projected
band 3%'25 7%7%

Regressed toward the TE mean. Model correlation r≈0.42 on a 2019-2025 walk-forward — volume only; efficiency not projected.

2025 Production

Receiving
32 Receptions482 Rec yards0 Rec TD15.1 Yards/rec

Performance Analysis · 2025 · vs TE peers

EfficiencyVolumeExplosivenessConsistencyPass-Down
Player type
Versatile TE

Balanced profile without a single dominant trait — contributes across multiple dimensions.

Balanced usageMulti-role
Peer percentiles
Opponent-adjusted EPA (WEPA/play)100th %ile · elite
Game-to-game consistency67th %ile · average
Key findings
  • Top-10% efficiency among TEs — elite opponent-adjusted EPA rate.
  • Limited usage share suggests a rotational or specialist role.
  • 5 high-impact games (EPA/play > 0.4) this season — elite ceiling.
  • Particularly dangerous on passing downs — efficiency spikes in obvious pass situations.
  • Production faded as the season progressed — 0.35 EPA/play decline from first to second half.
  • Peak game: 1.60 EPA/play in Wk 10 vs Boston College (SP+ -9).

NIL Market Tier· 2025

On3 valuation ↗
Elite

Top-3 player at position nationally. Collective + national brand deals.

Tier is a model estimate based on position, school brand, performance rank, and usage — not a reported deal. NIL deals are private. For a real market valuation, see On3's NIL profile, which factors in social following and actual deal tracking.

Historical Comparables · TE · efficiency + volume + value

Players from 2014–2024 matched on EPA efficiency, play volume, and adjusted value tier — not just one metric.

PlayerTeamYrPlaysWEPA/playLine valTotal EPA
Ty ThompsonTulane2024480.4200.420.2
Seth GreenMinnesota2018830.3900.032.4
Johnny LanganRutgers2020590.3000.017.7
Evan SvobodaWyoming2024750.2900.021.8
Jordan MyersRice2021590.2700.215.9

Comps are statistical — efficiency, volume, and value tier all factor in. Style and conference context differ.

Game Log · box score + EPA, week by week

Wk 1 vs Miami: +0.83 EPA/play1Wk 3 vs Texas A&M: +1.20 EPA/play3Wk 5 vs Arkansas: +1.08 EPA/play5Wk 6 vs Boise State: -0.17 EPA/play6Wk 7 vs NC State: +0.73 EPA/play7Wk 8 vs USC: -0.41 EPA/play8Wk 10 vs Boston College: +1.60 EPA/play10Wk 12 vs Pittsburgh: +0.02 EPA/play12Wk 14 vs Stanford: +0.34 EPA/play14
EPA per play, by weekabove 0 = added points · below = lost
WkOpponentResultOpp SP+RecRec YdsAvgRec TDLongEPA/play
1@MiamiL24-2720.759719.40650.83
3vsTexas A&ML40-4120.748521.30431.20
5@ArkansasW56-135.124321.50251.08
6vsBoise StateW28-73.1284.005-0.17
7vsNC StateW36-74.8710915.60360.73
8vsUSCW34-2416.9155.005-0.41
10@Boston CollegeW25-10-8.535919.70301.60
12@PittsburghW37-158.466711.20280.02
14@StanfordW49-20-11.8294.5060.34

Usage & Situational · Pro

Snap-share proxy
Overall
6.8%
Passing plays
14.6%
Rushing plays
0.0%
Standard downs
6.4%
Passing downs
7.7%
EPA by down type
Standard downs
0.52
Passing downs
0.74
Pass / Rush EPA
0.60 / —

Usage = share of team plays (CFBD has no true snap counts).

EPA = expected points added (opponent-adjusted). NIL estimates are model-based ranges, not reported deals. Data: CollegeFootballData. Not betting advice.