Scores
Dev
← Player leaders
Ethan Davis

#0Ethan Davis

Ethan Davis is a Slot Specialist TE for Tennessee.

2026 Usage Outlook · projected share of team plays

4%
projected
band 2%'25 6%6%

Regressed toward the TE mean. Model correlation r≈0.42 on a 2019-2025 walk-forward — volume only; efficiency not projected.

2025 Production

Receiving
21 Receptions257 Rec yards2 Rec TD12.2 Yards/rec

Performance Analysis · 2025 · vs TE peers

EfficiencyVolumeExplosivenessConsistencyPass-Down
Player type
Slot Specialist TE

The offense's primary passing-down weapon — routes, separation, and reliability on 3rd down define this role.

3rd-down converterRoute technicianHigh passing-down share
Peer percentiles
Opponent-adjusted EPA (WEPA/play)100th %ile · elite
Game-to-game consistency55th %ile · average
Key findings
  • Top-10% efficiency among TEs — elite opponent-adjusted EPA rate.
  • Limited usage share suggests a rotational or specialist role.
  • 4 high-impact games (EPA/play > 0.4) this season — elite ceiling.
  • Particularly dangerous on passing downs — efficiency spikes in obvious pass situations.
  • Strong second-half surge — EPA/play improved 1.17 from the first to second half of the season.
  • Peak game: 1.81 EPA/play in Wk 12 vs New Mexico State (SP+ -16).

NIL Market Tier· 2025

On3 valuation ↗
Elite

Top-3 player at position nationally. Collective + national brand deals.

Tier is a model estimate based on position, school brand, performance rank, and usage — not a reported deal. NIL deals are private. For a real market valuation, see On3's NIL profile, which factors in social following and actual deal tracking.

Historical Comparables · TE · efficiency + volume + value

Players from 2014–2024 matched on EPA efficiency, play volume, and adjusted value tier — not just one metric.

PlayerTeamYrPlaysWEPA/playLine valTotal EPA
Ty ThompsonTulane2024480.4200.420.2
Seth GreenMinnesota2018830.3900.032.4
Johnny LanganRutgers2020590.3000.017.7
Evan SvobodaWyoming2024750.2900.021.8
Jordan MyersRice2021590.2700.215.9

Comps are statistical — efficiency, volume, and value tier all factor in. Style and conference context differ.

Game Log · box score + EPA, week by week

Wk 2 vs East Tennessee State: -0.93 EPA/play2Wk 10 vs Oklahoma: +0.71 EPA/play10Wk 12 vs New Mexico State: +1.81 EPA/play12Wk 13 vs Florida: +0.43 EPA/play13Wk 14 vs Vanderbilt: +0.92 EPA/play14
EPA per play, by weekabove 0 = added points · below = lost
WkOpponentResultOpp SP+RecRec YdsAvgRec TDLongEPA/play
2vsEast Tennessee StateW72-17111.001-0.93
9@KentuckyW56-341.822311.5113
10vsOklahomaL27-3318.356212.40400.71
12vsNew Mexico StateW42-9-15.511414.00141.81
13@FloridaW31-113.557214.41230.43
14vsVanderbiltL24-4520.378512.10200.92

Usage & Situational · Pro

Snap-share proxy
Overall
5.5%
Passing plays
11.2%
Rushing plays
0.0%
Standard downs
4.4%
Passing downs
8.4%
EPA by down type
Standard downs
0.54
Passing downs
0.95
Pass / Rush EPA
0.71 / —

Usage = share of team plays (CFBD has no true snap counts).

EPA = expected points added (opponent-adjusted). NIL estimates are model-based ranges, not reported deals. Data: CollegeFootballData. Not betting advice.