Scores
Dev
← Player leaders
Jalil Farooq

#1Jalil Farooq

Jalil Farooq is a Versatile WR for Maryland. Jalil's 2025 season ranks in the 88th percentile nationally by opponent-adjusted EPA per play across 76 plays — a above-average rate for the WR.

2026 Usage Outlook · projected share of team plays

9%
projected
band 5%'25 10%12%

Regressed toward the WR mean. Model correlation r≈0.47 on a 2019-2025 walk-forward — volume only; efficiency not projected.

2025 Production

Receiving
58 Receptions545 Rec yards4 Rec TD9.4 Yards/rec
Returns
6 Punt returns46 PR yards0 PR TD

Performance Analysis · 2025 · vs WR peers

EfficiencyVolumeExplosivenessConsistencyPass-Down
Player type
Versatile WR

Balanced profile without a single dominant trait — contributes across multiple dimensions.

Balanced usageMulti-role
Peer percentiles
Opponent-adjusted EPA (WEPA/play)88th %ile · above avg
Game-to-game consistency73th %ile · average
Key findings
  • Above-average efficiency for the WR position (88th percentile).
  • High game-to-game consistency — reliable floor each week.
  • 6 high-impact games (EPA/play > 0.4) this season — elite ceiling.
  • Peak game: 0.91 EPA/play in Wk 13 vs Michigan (SP+ 12).

NIL Market Tier· 2025

On3 valuation ↗
Star

Top-10 nationally. Multiple mid-to-large collective deals expected.

Tier is a model estimate based on position, school brand, performance rank, and usage — not a reported deal. NIL deals are private. For a real market valuation, see On3's NIL profile, which factors in social following and actual deal tracking.

Historical Comparables · WR · efficiency + volume + value

Players from 2014–2024 matched on EPA efficiency, play volume, and adjusted value tier — not just one metric.

PlayerTeamYrPlaysWEPA/playLine valTotal EPA
Zach AbeyNavy2016700.3700.825.9
Dane KinamonAir Force2021390.4100.716.0
Micah DavisAir Force2021440.3700.616.3
Savion WilliamsTCU2024560.4501.125.2
JoJo NatsonUtah State2014510.3901.019.9

Comps are statistical — efficiency, volume, and value tier all factor in. Style and conference context differ.

Game Log · box score + EPA, week by week

Wk 1 vs Florida Atlantic: +0.29 EPA/play1Wk 2 vs Northern Illinois: +0.21 EPA/play2Wk 3 vs Towson: +0.54 EPA/play3Wk 4 vs Wisconsin: +0.68 EPA/play4Wk 6 vs Washington: +0.20 EPA/play6Wk 7 vs Nebraska: +0.31 EPA/play7Wk 8 vs UCLA: +0.22 EPA/play8Wk 10 vs Indiana: +0.62 EPA/play10Wk 11 vs Rutgers: -0.55 EPA/play11Wk 12 vs Illinois: +0.64 EPA/play12Wk 13 vs Michigan: +0.91 EPA/play13Wk 14 vs Michigan State: +0.86 EPA/play14
EPA per play, by weekabove 0 = added points · below = lost
WkOpponentResultOpp SP+RecRec YdsAvgRec TDLongEPA/play
1vsFlorida AtlanticW39-7-8.744310.80240.29
2vsNorthern IllinoisW20-9-16.755511.00200.21
3vsTowsonW44-1755310.60180.54
4@WisconsinW27-10-4.433110.30120.68
6vsWashingtonL20-2418.48516.40160.20
7vsNebraskaL31-346.22157.5080.31
8@UCLAL17-20-8.74297.31100.22
10vsIndianaL10-5532.444310.80210.62
11@RutgersL20-351.0393.005-0.55
12@IllinoisL6-2412.95357.00130.64
13vsMichiganL20-4512.457114.21290.91
14vsMichigan StateL28-38-3.41011011.02240.86

Usage & Situational · Pro

Snap-share proxy
Overall
10.0%
Passing plays
15.9%
Rushing plays
0.7%
Standard downs
9.1%
Passing downs
11.9%
EPA by down type
Standard downs
0.43
Passing downs
0.42
Pass / Rush EPA
0.44 / -0.09

Usage = share of team plays (CFBD has no true snap counts).

EPA = expected points added (opponent-adjusted). NIL estimates are model-based ranges, not reported deals. Data: CollegeFootballData. Not betting advice.