Scores
Dev
← Player leaders
Joe Royer

#11Joe Royer

Joe Royer is a Versatile TE for Cincinnati. Joe's 2025 season produced 26.4 total EPA across 36 plays.

2026 Usage Outlook · projected share of team plays

4%
projected
band 2%'25 6%6%

Regressed toward the TE mean. Model correlation r≈0.42 on a 2019-2025 walk-forward — volume only; efficiency not projected.

2025 Production

Receiving
29 Receptions416 Rec yards4 Rec TD14.3 Yards/rec

Performance Analysis · 2025 · vs TE peers

EfficiencyVolumeExplosivenessConsistencyPass-Down
Player type
Versatile TE

Balanced profile without a single dominant trait — contributes across multiple dimensions.

Balanced usageMulti-role
Peer percentiles
Opponent-adjusted EPA (WEPA/play)100th %ile · elite
Game-to-game consistency66th %ile · average
Key findings
  • Top-10% efficiency among TEs — elite opponent-adjusted EPA rate.
  • Limited usage share suggests a rotational or specialist role.
  • 8 high-impact games (EPA/play > 0.4) this season — elite ceiling.
  • Particularly dangerous on passing downs — efficiency spikes in obvious pass situations.
  • Production faded as the season progressed — 0.41 EPA/play decline from first to second half.
  • Peak game: 3.65 EPA/play in Wk 2 vs Bowling Green (SP+ -13).

NIL Market Tier· 2025

On3 valuation ↗
Elite

Top-3 player at position nationally. Collective + national brand deals.

Tier is a model estimate based on position, school brand, performance rank, and usage — not a reported deal. NIL deals are private. For a real market valuation, see On3's NIL profile, which factors in social following and actual deal tracking.

Historical Comparables · TE · efficiency + volume + value

Players from 2014–2024 matched on EPA efficiency, play volume, and adjusted value tier — not just one metric.

PlayerTeamYrPlaysWEPA/playLine valTotal EPA
Ty ThompsonTulane2024480.4200.420.2
Seth GreenMinnesota2018830.3900.032.4
Johnny LanganRutgers2020590.3000.017.7
Evan SvobodaWyoming2024750.2900.021.8
Jordan MyersRice2021590.2700.215.9

Comps are statistical — efficiency, volume, and value tier all factor in. Style and conference context differ.

Game Log · box score + EPA, week by week

Wk 1 vs Nebraska: -0.41 EPA/play1Wk 2 vs Bowling Green: +3.65 EPA/play2Wk 3 vs Northwestern State: +1.20 EPA/play3Wk 5 vs Kansas: +1.31 EPA/play5Wk 6 vs Iowa State: +0.30 EPA/play6Wk 7 vs UCF: +0.55 EPA/play7Wk 8 vs Oklahoma State: +1.06 EPA/play8Wk 10 vs Utah: -0.27 EPA/play10Wk 12 vs Arizona: +0.74 EPA/play12Wk 13 vs BYU: +0.48 EPA/play13Wk 14 vs TCU: +1.43 EPA/play14
EPA per play, by weekabove 0 = added points · below = lost
WkOpponentResultOpp SP+RecRec YdsAvgRec TDLongEPA/play
1vsNebraskaL17-206.23113.706-0.41
2vsBowling GreenW34-20-12.6210452.00733.65
3vsNorthwestern StateW70-03237.72211.20
5@KansasW37-344.122412.00201.31
6vsIowa StateW38-309.94205.01120.30
7vsUCFW20-11-1.228341.50670.55
8@Oklahoma StateW49-17-15.156312.61271.06
9vsBaylorW41-201.411212.0012
10@UtahL14-4522.211010.0010-0.27
12vsArizonaL24-3012.0188.0080.74
13vsBYUL14-2615.92136.5080.48
14@TCUL23-458.334515.00261.43

Usage & Situational · Pro

Snap-share proxy
Overall
5.5%
Passing plays
11.0%
Rushing plays
0.0%
Standard downs
5.7%
Passing downs
5.2%
EPA by down type
Standard downs
0.30
Passing downs
1.85
Pass / Rush EPA
0.73 / —

Usage = share of team plays (CFBD has no true snap counts).

EPA = expected points added (opponent-adjusted). NIL estimates are model-based ranges, not reported deals. Data: CollegeFootballData. Not betting advice.