Scores
Dev
← Player leaders
Kenyon Sadiq

#18Kenyon Sadiq

Kenyon Sadiq is a Versatile TE for Oregon. Kenyon's 2025 season ranks in the 100th percentile nationally by opponent-adjusted EPA per play across 71 plays — a elite rate for the TE.

2026 Usage Outlook · projected share of team plays

5%
projected
band 3%'25 9%7%

Regressed toward the TE mean. Model correlation r≈0.42 on a 2019-2025 walk-forward — volume only; efficiency not projected.

2025 Production

Receiving
51 Receptions560 Rec yards8 Rec TD11.0 Yards/rec

Performance Analysis · 2025 · vs TE peers

EfficiencyVolumeExplosivenessConsistencyPass-Down
Player type
Versatile TE

Balanced profile without a single dominant trait — contributes across multiple dimensions.

Balanced usageMulti-role
Peer percentiles
Opponent-adjusted EPA (WEPA/play)100th %ile · elite
Game-to-game consistency63th %ile · average
Key findings
  • Top-10% efficiency among TEs — elite opponent-adjusted EPA rate.
  • Limited usage share suggests a rotational or specialist role.
  • 7 high-impact games (EPA/play > 0.4) this season — elite ceiling.
  • Production faded as the season progressed — 0.81 EPA/play decline from first to second half.
  • Peak game: 2.29 EPA/play in Wk 8 vs Rutgers (SP+ 1).

NIL Market Tier· 2025

On3 valuation ↗
Elite

Top-3 player at position nationally. Collective + national brand deals.

Tier is a model estimate based on position, school brand, performance rank, and usage — not a reported deal. NIL deals are private. For a real market valuation, see On3's NIL profile, which factors in social following and actual deal tracking.

Historical Comparables · TE · efficiency + volume + value

Players from 2014–2024 matched on EPA efficiency, play volume, and adjusted value tier — not just one metric.

PlayerTeamYrPlaysWEPA/playLine valTotal EPA
Ty ThompsonTulane2024480.4200.420.2
Seth GreenMinnesota2018830.3900.032.4
Johnny LanganRutgers2020590.3000.017.7
Evan SvobodaWyoming2024750.2900.021.8
Jordan MyersRice2021590.2700.215.9

Comps are statistical — efficiency, volume, and value tier all factor in. Style and conference context differ.

Game Log · box score + EPA, week by week

Wk 1 vs Montana State: +0.47 EPA/play1Wk 2 vs Oklahoma State: +2.02 EPA/play2Wk 3 vs Northwestern: +1.87 EPA/play3Wk 4 vs Oregon State: +0.19 EPA/play4Wk 5 vs Penn State: +0.13 EPA/play5Wk 7 vs Indiana: +0.56 EPA/play7Wk 8 vs Rutgers: +2.29 EPA/play8Wk 12 vs Minnesota: +1.18 EPA/play12Wk 13 vs USC: +1.09 EPA/play13Wk 14 vs Washington: -0.58 EPA/play14Wk 1 vs Indiana: -0.04 EPA/play1Wk 1 vs Texas Tech: -0.04 EPA/play1Wk 1 vs James Madison: -0.04 EPA/play1
EPA per play, by weekabove 0 = added points · below = lost
WkOpponentResultOpp SP+RecRec YdsAvgRec TDLongEPA/play
1vsMontana StateW59-1312020.01200.47
2vsOklahoma StateW69-3-15.124020.00262.02
3@NorthwesternW34-145.823517.51241.87
4vsOregon StateW41-7-15.946015.01240.19
5@Penn StateW30-2418.16498.20230.13
7vsIndianaL20-3032.422110.50130.56
8@RutgersW56-101.048020.02302.29
9vsWisconsinW21-7-4.4166.006
12vsMinnesotaW42-131.589612.01231.18
13vsUSCW42-2716.967212.02281.09
14@WashingtonW26-1418.44112.805-0.58
1vsIndianaL22-5632.45295.8021-0.04
1vsTexas TechW23-027.64225.5011-0.04
1vsJames MadisonW51-3412.32199.5016-0.04

Usage & Situational · Pro

Snap-share proxy
Overall
8.5%
Passing plays
17.3%
Rushing plays
0.8%
Standard downs
7.5%
Passing downs
11.3%
EPA by down type
Standard downs
0.62
Passing downs
0.37
Pass / Rush EPA
0.59 / -0.39

Usage = share of team plays (CFBD has no true snap counts).

EPA = expected points added (opponent-adjusted). NIL estimates are model-based ranges, not reported deals. Data: CollegeFootballData. Not betting advice.