Scores
Dev
← Player leaders
Michael Mayer

#87Michael Mayer

Michael Mayer is a Versatile TE for Notre Dame. Michael's 2021 season ranks in the 100th percentile nationally by opponent-adjusted EPA per play across 90 plays — a elite rate for the TE.

2021 Production

Receiving
71 Receptions840 Rec yards7 Rec TD11.8 Yards/rec

Performance Analysis · 2021 · vs TE peers

EfficiencyVolumeExplosivenessConsistencyPass-Down
Player type
Versatile TE

Balanced profile without a single dominant trait — contributes across multiple dimensions.

Balanced usageMulti-role
Peer percentiles
Opponent-adjusted EPA (WEPA/play)100th %ile · elite
Game-to-game consistency70th %ile · average
Key findings
  • Top-10% efficiency among TEs — elite opponent-adjusted EPA rate.
  • High game-to-game consistency — reliable floor each week.
  • 9 high-impact games (EPA/play > 0.4) this season — elite ceiling.
  • Particularly dangerous on passing downs — efficiency spikes in obvious pass situations.
  • Strong second-half surge — EPA/play improved 0.56 from the first to second half of the season.
  • Peak game: 2.89 EPA/play in Wk 12 vs Georgia Tech (SP+ -7).

NIL Market Tier· 2021

On3 valuation ↗
Elite

Top-3 player at position nationally. Collective + national brand deals.

Tier is a model estimate based on position, school brand, performance rank, and usage — not a reported deal. NIL deals are private. For a real market valuation, see On3's NIL profile, which factors in social following and actual deal tracking.

Historical Comparables · TE · efficiency + volume + value

Players from 2014–2024 matched on EPA efficiency, play volume, and adjusted value tier — not just one metric.

PlayerTeamYrPlaysWEPA/playLine valTotal EPA
Ty ThompsonTulane2024480.4200.420.2
Seth GreenMinnesota2018830.3900.032.4
Johnny LanganRutgers2020590.3000.017.7
Evan SvobodaWyoming2024750.2900.021.8
Jordan MyersRice2021590.2700.215.9

Comps are statistical — efficiency, volume, and value tier all factor in. Style and conference context differ.

Game Log · box score + EPA, week by week

Wk 1 vs Florida State: +0.55 EPA/play1Wk 2 vs Toledo: +0.80 EPA/play2Wk 3 vs Purdue: +0.07 EPA/play3Wk 4 vs Wisconsin: -0.01 EPA/play4Wk 5 vs Cincinnati: +0.69 EPA/play5Wk 8 vs USC: +0.46 EPA/play8Wk 9 vs North Carolina: +0.39 EPA/play9Wk 10 vs Navy: +0.49 EPA/play10Wk 11 vs Virginia: +0.73 EPA/play11Wk 12 vs Georgia Tech: +2.89 EPA/play12Wk 13 vs Stanford: +0.81 EPA/play13Wk 1 vs Oklahoma State: +0.63 EPA/play1
EPA per play, by weekabove 0 = added points · below = lost
WkOpponentResultOpp SP+RecRec YdsAvgRec TDLongEPA/play
1@Florida StateW41-387.6912013.31410.55
2vsToledoW32-296.978111.62280.80
3vsPurdueW27-1310.3155.0050.07
4vsWisconsinW41-1320.17618.7022-0.01
5vsCincinnatiL13-2421.289311.60200.69
8vsUSCW31-16-0.655410.80160.46
9vsNorth CarolinaW44-346.445112.80300.39
10vsNavyW34-6-8.54287.00140.49
11@VirginiaW28-37.278412.01220.73
12vsGeorgia TechW55-0-6.738628.71522.89
13@StanfordW45-14-10.2910511.70340.81
1vsOklahoma StateL35-3717.277210.32190.63

Usage & Situational · Pro

Snap-share proxy
Overall
11.3%
Passing plays
20.6%
Rushing plays
0.0%
Standard downs
9.6%
Passing downs
14.9%
EPA by down type
Standard downs
0.48
Passing downs
0.77
Pass / Rush EPA
0.61 / —

Usage = share of team plays (CFBD has no true snap counts).

EPA = expected points added (opponent-adjusted). NIL estimates are model-based ranges, not reported deals. Data: CollegeFootballData. Not betting advice.