Scores
Dev
← Player leaders
Miles Kitselman

#87Miles Kitselman

Miles Kitselman is a Slot Specialist TE for Tennessee. Miles's 2025 season produced 19.1 total EPA across 36 plays.

2026 Usage Outlook · projected share of team plays

4%
projected
band 2%'25 6%6%

Regressed toward the TE mean. Model correlation r≈0.42 on a 2019-2025 walk-forward — volume only; efficiency not projected.

2025 Production

Receiving
26 Receptions253 Rec yards2 Rec TD9.7 Yards/rec

Performance Analysis · 2025 · vs TE peers

EfficiencyVolumeExplosivenessConsistencyPass-Down
Player type
Slot Specialist TE

The offense's primary passing-down weapon — routes, separation, and reliability on 3rd down define this role.

3rd-down converterRoute technicianHigh passing-down share
Peer percentiles
Opponent-adjusted EPA (WEPA/play)100th %ile · elite
Game-to-game consistency70th %ile · average
Key findings
  • Top-10% efficiency among TEs — elite opponent-adjusted EPA rate.
  • Limited usage share suggests a rotational or specialist role.
  • High game-to-game consistency — reliable floor each week.
  • 5 high-impact games (EPA/play > 0.4) this season — elite ceiling.
  • Production faded as the season progressed — 0.67 EPA/play decline from first to second half.
  • Peak game: 1.50 EPA/play in Wk 1 vs Syracuse (SP+ -13).

NIL Market Tier· 2025

On3 valuation ↗
Elite

Top-3 player at position nationally. Collective + national brand deals.

Tier is a model estimate based on position, school brand, performance rank, and usage — not a reported deal. NIL deals are private. For a real market valuation, see On3's NIL profile, which factors in social following and actual deal tracking.

Historical Comparables · TE · efficiency + volume + value

Players from 2014–2024 matched on EPA efficiency, play volume, and adjusted value tier — not just one metric.

PlayerTeamYrPlaysWEPA/playLine valTotal EPA
Ty ThompsonTulane2024480.4200.420.2
Seth GreenMinnesota2018830.3900.032.4
Johnny LanganRutgers2020590.3000.017.7
Evan SvobodaWyoming2024750.2900.021.8
Jordan MyersRice2021590.2700.215.9

Comps are statistical — efficiency, volume, and value tier all factor in. Style and conference context differ.

Game Log · box score + EPA, week by week

Wk 1 vs Syracuse: +1.50 EPA/play1Wk 2 vs East Tennessee State: +0.25 EPA/play2Wk 3 vs Georgia: +0.27 EPA/play3Wk 4 vs UAB: +1.33 EPA/play4Wk 5 vs Mississippi State: +0.44 EPA/play5Wk 7 vs Arkansas: +0.83 EPA/play7Wk 8 vs Alabama: +0.55 EPA/play8Wk 10 vs Oklahoma: -0.15 EPA/play10Wk 1 vs Illinois: -0.12 EPA/play1
EPA per play, by weekabove 0 = added points · below = lost
WkOpponentResultOpp SP+RecRec YdsAvgRec TDLongEPA/play
1vsSyracuseW45-26-13.12105.0181.50
2vsEast Tennessee StateW72-1733612.00170.25
3vsGeorgiaL41-4424.133311.00180.27
4vsUABW56-24-15.822713.50161.33
5@Mississippi StateW41-344.144210.50170.44
7vsArkansasW34-315.155611.21230.83
8@AlabamaL20-3714.83186.0090.55
9@KentuckyW56-341.8144.004
10vsOklahomaL27-3318.322412.0019-0.15
12vsNew Mexico StateW42-9-15.5
1vsIllinoisL28-3012.9133.003-0.12

Usage & Situational · Pro

Snap-share proxy
Overall
5.5%
Passing plays
10.7%
Rushing plays
0.3%
Standard downs
4.2%
Passing downs
9.1%
EPA by down type
Standard downs
0.70
Passing downs
0.32
Pass / Rush EPA
0.49 / 2.14

Usage = share of team plays (CFBD has no true snap counts).

EPA = expected points added (opponent-adjusted). NIL estimates are model-based ranges, not reported deals. Data: CollegeFootballData. Not betting advice.