Scores
Dev
← Player leaders
Trebor Pena

#8Trebor Pena

Trebor Pena is a Versatile WR for Penn State. Trebor's 2025 season ranks in the 88th percentile nationally by opponent-adjusted EPA per play across 74 plays — a above-average rate for the WR.

2026 Usage Outlook · projected share of team plays

8%
projected
band 5%'25 10%12%

Regressed toward the WR mean. Model correlation r≈0.47 on a 2019-2025 walk-forward — volume only; efficiency not projected.

2025 Production

Rushing
69 Rush yards0 Rush TD11 Carries6.3 Yards/carry
Receiving
49 Receptions552 Rec yards2 Rec TD11.3 Yards/rec
Returns
1 Kick returns16 KR yards0 KR TD8 Punt returns71 PR yards0 PR TD

Performance Analysis · 2025 · vs WR peers

EfficiencyVolumeExplosivenessConsistencyPass-Down
Player type
Versatile WR

Balanced profile without a single dominant trait — contributes across multiple dimensions.

Balanced usageMulti-role
Peer percentiles
Opponent-adjusted EPA (WEPA/play)88th %ile · above avg
Game-to-game consistency59th %ile · average
Key findings
  • Above-average efficiency for the WR position (88th percentile).
  • Limited usage share suggests a rotational or specialist role.
  • 6 high-impact games (EPA/play > 0.4) this season — elite ceiling.
  • Particularly dangerous on passing downs — efficiency spikes in obvious pass situations.
  • Strong second-half surge — EPA/play improved 0.54 from the first to second half of the season.
  • Peak game: 1.02 EPA/play in Wk 1 vs Clemson (SP+ 10).

NIL Market Tier· 2025

On3 valuation ↗
Star

Top-10 nationally. Multiple mid-to-large collective deals expected.

Tier is a model estimate based on position, school brand, performance rank, and usage — not a reported deal. NIL deals are private. For a real market valuation, see On3's NIL profile, which factors in social following and actual deal tracking.

Historical Comparables · WR · efficiency + volume + value

Players from 2014–2024 matched on EPA efficiency, play volume, and adjusted value tier — not just one metric.

PlayerTeamYrPlaysWEPA/playLine valTotal EPA
Zach AbeyNavy2016700.3700.825.9
Micah DavisAir Force2021440.3700.616.3
Eli HeidenreichNavy2024660.3400.722.4
Keytaon ThompsonVirginia2021410.3700.615.2
Dane KinamonAir Force2021390.4100.716.0

Comps are statistical — efficiency, volume, and value tier all factor in. Style and conference context differ.

Game Log · box score + EPA, week by week

Wk 1 vs Nevada: +0.45 EPA/play1Wk 3 vs Villanova: +0.44 EPA/play3Wk 5 vs Oregon: +0.09 EPA/play5Wk 6 vs UCLA: -0.53 EPA/play6Wk 7 vs Northwestern: -0.07 EPA/play7Wk 8 vs Iowa: +0.07 EPA/play8Wk 10 vs Ohio State: -0.21 EPA/play10Wk 11 vs Indiana: +0.97 EPA/play11Wk 12 vs Michigan State: +0.89 EPA/play12Wk 13 vs Nebraska: +0.68 EPA/play13Wk 14 vs Rutgers: +0.37 EPA/play14Wk 1 vs Clemson: +1.02 EPA/play1
EPA per play, by weekabove 0 = added points · below = lost
WkOpponentResultOpp SP+RecRec YdsAvgRec TDLongEPA/play
1vsNevadaW46-11-13.477410.60180.45
2vsFlorida InternationalW34-0-10.523216.0030
3vsVillanovaW52-646015.01230.44
5vsOregonL24-3025.92168.00120.09
6@UCLAL37-42-8.73155.0012-0.53
7vsNorthwesternL21-225.8252.504-0.07
8@IowaL24-2519.73196.30130.07
10@Ohio StateL14-3830.13113.706-0.21
11vsIndianaL24-2732.469916.50430.97
12@Michigan StateW28-10-3.44389.50250.89
13vsNebraskaW37-106.244711.80290.68
14@RutgersW40-361.04369.00230.37
1vsClemsonW22-109.5510020.01731.02

Usage & Situational · Pro

Snap-share proxy
Overall
9.6%
Passing plays
19.7%
Rushing plays
2.7%
Standard downs
9.9%
Passing downs
8.8%
EPA by down type
Standard downs
0.28
Passing downs
0.81
Pass / Rush EPA
0.46 / 0.09

Usage = share of team plays (CFBD has no true snap counts).

EPA = expected points added (opponent-adjusted). NIL estimates are model-based ranges, not reported deals. Data: CollegeFootballData. Not betting advice.