Scores
Dev
← Player leaders
Trent Walker

#7Trent Walker

Trent Walker is a Versatile WR for Oregon State. Trent's 2025 season ranks in the 100th percentile nationally by opponent-adjusted EPA per play across 85 plays — a elite rate for the WR.

2026 Usage Outlook · projected share of team plays

10%
projected
band 6%'25 12%13%

Regressed toward the WR mean. Model correlation r≈0.47 on a 2019-2025 walk-forward — volume only; efficiency not projected.

2025 Production

Receiving
68 Receptions823 Rec yards2 Rec TD12.1 Yards/rec
Returns
1 Kick returns6 KR yards0 KR TD10 Punt returns80 PR yards0 PR TD

Performance Analysis · 2025 · vs WR peers

EfficiencyVolumeExplosivenessConsistencyPass-Down
Player type
Versatile WR

Balanced profile without a single dominant trait — contributes across multiple dimensions.

Balanced usageMulti-role
Peer percentiles
Opponent-adjusted EPA (WEPA/play)100th %ile · elite
Game-to-game consistency45th %ile · average
Key findings
  • Top-10% efficiency among WRs — elite opponent-adjusted EPA rate.
  • 5 high-impact games (EPA/play > 0.4) this season — elite ceiling.
  • Production faded as the season progressed — 0.75 EPA/play decline from first to second half.
  • Peak game: 1.14 EPA/play in Wk 6 vs App State (SP+ -11).

NIL Market Tier· 2025

On3 valuation ↗
Elite

Top-3 player at position nationally. Collective + national brand deals.

Tier is a model estimate based on position, school brand, performance rank, and usage — not a reported deal. NIL deals are private. For a real market valuation, see On3's NIL profile, which factors in social following and actual deal tracking.

Historical Comparables · WR · efficiency + volume + value

Players from 2014–2024 matched on EPA efficiency, play volume, and adjusted value tier — not just one metric.

PlayerTeamYrPlaysWEPA/playLine valTotal EPA
Keytaon ThompsonMississippi State2017700.4601.232.2
Savion WilliamsTCU2024560.4501.125.2
DeAndre HughesAir Force2021600.4701.328.2
Zach AbeyNavy2016700.3700.825.9
Dane KinamonAir Force2021390.4100.716.0

Comps are statistical — efficiency, volume, and value tier all factor in. Style and conference context differ.

Game Log · box score + EPA, week by week

Wk 1 vs California: +1.04 EPA/play1Wk 2 vs Fresno State: +1.14 EPA/play2Wk 3 vs Texas Tech: +0.22 EPA/play3Wk 5 vs Houston: +0.52 EPA/play5Wk 6 vs App State: +1.14 EPA/play6Wk 7 vs Wake Forest: -0.71 EPA/play7Wk 8 vs Lafayette: -0.05 EPA/play8Wk 10 vs Washington State: -0.02 EPA/play10Wk 11 vs Sam Houston: -0.51 EPA/play11Wk 12 vs Tulsa: +0.68 EPA/play12Wk 14 vs Washington State: +0.20 EPA/play14
EPA per play, by weekabove 0 = added points · below = lost
WkOpponentResultOpp SP+RecRec YdsAvgRec TDLongEPA/play
1vsCaliforniaL15-34-3.2913615.10311.04
2vsFresno StateL27-361.879914.10241.14
3@Texas TechL14-4527.67679.60150.22
5vsHoustonL24-277.4710314.70220.52
6@App StateL23-27-11.41317913.80371.14
7vsWake ForestL14-395.72147.009-0.71
8vsLafayetteW45-133113.709-0.05
10vsWashington StateW10-73.84225.5014-0.02
11vsSam HoustonL17-21-27.84143.508-0.51
12@TulsaL14-31-10.0511723.41430.68
14@Washington StateL8-323.87618.71180.20

Usage & Situational · Pro

Snap-share proxy
Overall
11.8%
Passing plays
22.0%
Rushing plays
0.0%
Standard downs
10.2%
Passing downs
15.4%
EPA by down type
Standard downs
0.50
Passing downs
0.41
Pass / Rush EPA
0.47 / —

Usage = share of team plays (CFBD has no true snap counts).

EPA = expected points added (opponent-adjusted). NIL estimates are model-based ranges, not reported deals. Data: CollegeFootballData. Not betting advice.