Scores
Dev
← Player leaders
Nyziah Hunter

#13Nyziah Hunter

Nyziah Hunter is a Versatile WR for Nebraska. Nyziah's 2025 season ranks in the 100th percentile nationally by opponent-adjusted EPA per play across 57 plays — a elite rate for the WR.

2026 Usage Outlook · projected share of team plays

8%
projected
band 4%'25 8%11%

Regressed toward the WR mean. Model correlation r≈0.47 on a 2019-2025 walk-forward — volume only; efficiency not projected.

2025 Production

Receiving
43 Receptions617 Rec yards5 Rec TD14.3 Yards/rec

Performance Analysis · 2025 · vs WR peers

EfficiencyVolumeExplosivenessConsistencyPass-Down
Player type
Versatile WR

Balanced profile without a single dominant trait — contributes across multiple dimensions.

Balanced usageMulti-role
Peer percentiles
Opponent-adjusted EPA (WEPA/play)100th %ile · elite
Game-to-game consistency56th %ile · average
Key findings
  • Top-10% efficiency among WRs — elite opponent-adjusted EPA rate.
  • Limited usage share suggests a rotational or specialist role.
  • 4 high-impact games (EPA/play > 0.4) this season — elite ceiling.
  • Production faded as the season progressed — 0.82 EPA/play decline from first to second half.
  • Peak game: 2.14 EPA/play in Wk 7 vs Maryland (SP+ 1).

NIL Market Tier· 2025

On3 valuation ↗
Elite

Top-3 player at position nationally. Collective + national brand deals.

Tier is a model estimate based on position, school brand, performance rank, and usage — not a reported deal. NIL deals are private. For a real market valuation, see On3's NIL profile, which factors in social following and actual deal tracking.

Historical Comparables · WR · efficiency + volume + value

Players from 2014–2024 matched on EPA efficiency, play volume, and adjusted value tier — not just one metric.

PlayerTeamYrPlaysWEPA/playLine valTotal EPA
Savion WilliamsTCU2024560.4501.125.2
Dane KinamonAir Force2021390.4100.716.0
Keytaon ThompsonMississippi State2017700.4601.232.2
DeAndre HughesAir Force2021600.4701.328.2
Javion PoseyFlorida Atlantic2020530.4501.423.8

Comps are statistical — efficiency, volume, and value tier all factor in. Style and conference context differ.

Game Log · box score + EPA, week by week

Wk 1 vs Cincinnati: +0.33 EPA/play1Wk 2 vs Akron: +1.16 EPA/play2Wk 3 vs Houston Christian: +0.18 EPA/play3Wk 4 vs Michigan: -0.03 EPA/play4Wk 6 vs Michigan State: +1.48 EPA/play6Wk 7 vs Maryland: +2.14 EPA/play7Wk 8 vs Minnesota: -0.03 EPA/play8Wk 10 vs USC: -0.16 EPA/play10Wk 11 vs UCLA: +0.68 EPA/play11Wk 13 vs Penn State: -0.39 EPA/play13Wk 14 vs Iowa: +0.20 EPA/play14
EPA per play, by weekabove 0 = added points · below = lost
WkOpponentResultOpp SP+RecRec YdsAvgRec TDLongEPA/play
1vsCincinnatiW20-174.566510.81240.33
2vsAkronW68-0-13.948220.50361.16
3vsHouston ChristianW59-711616.00160.18
4vsMichiganL27-3012.423417.0021-0.03
6vsMichigan StateW38-27-3.449323.31591.48
7@MarylandW34-310.6512525.02642.14
8@MinnesotaL6-241.55408.0012-0.03
9vsNorthwesternW28-215.867011.7126
10vsUSCL17-2116.95306.0011-0.16
11@UCLAW28-21-8.733712.30170.68
13@Penn StateL10-3718.111919.0019-0.39
14vsIowaL16-4019.7166.0060.20

Usage & Situational · Pro

Snap-share proxy
Overall
8.2%
Passing plays
16.3%
Rushing plays
0.0%
Standard downs
8.2%
Passing downs
8.0%
EPA by down type
Standard downs
0.52
Passing downs
0.33
Pass / Rush EPA
0.48 / —

Usage = share of team plays (CFBD has no true snap counts).

EPA = expected points added (opponent-adjusted). NIL estimates are model-based ranges, not reported deals. Data: CollegeFootballData. Not betting advice.